User:Annsli.Hilton/Marine habitats/Peytonw27 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
This article was very well written and easily understood. I was impressed with a lot of the information that I learned from reading the article. One change I would add to the article would be the way the titles are set up. I would start with mud flats and work my way into the deep sea. These changes would start on land and then make their way into the ocean. I would also add pictures along with the other two topics which is the mud flats and seafloor. The article reflects the perspectives represented in the published literature well, from what was read there doesn’t seem to be any important viewpoints left out. The article does not draw conclusions, nor does it try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view. The citing throughout the paragraphs were well done and seems to use reliable sources. The information that was added seems to improve the overall quality of the article, along with the picture that help enhance understanding of the topic.