User:AnonStu10/Kobe Mosque/Majed Eid M Rahimi Peer Review

General info
AnonStu10
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AnonStu10/Kobe_Mosque?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Kobe Mosque

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead Section:

The lead section of the draft article requires revision, as it omits mentioning sections that are later discussed in the article. Nonetheless, the effort put into crafting the lead section is commendable, as it largely adheres to the format and provides a strong introduction to the topic. It effectively focuses on the subject matter and offers pertinent details about the discussion. However, the lead section appears overly detailed and could benefit from being more concise.

Content:

The content added to the article adequately addresses the subject matter, providing relevant and up-to-date information. It effectively covers a topic that is often underrepresented in literature.

Tone and Balance:

The tone of the content adheres to Wikipedia's impartial criteria, presenting information without bias or favoritism towards any particular viewpoint. The article maintains a balanced approach, ensuring that no position is favored over another.

Sources and References:

The sources provided by the student are appropriate, accessible, and meet the criteria of authenticity. They are recent, relevant, and support the claims made in the article without bias. Proper citation and integration of sources enhance the credibility of the content.

Organization:

The article is well-organized, with clear sections providing information on various aspects of the topic. However, there is some repetition throughout the article that needs to be addressed to improve clarity and conciseness.

Images and Media:

No images have been added to the article, which is a missed opportunity considering the visual appeal they could provide. Adding relevant images of the subject matter would enhance the reader's understanding and engagement with the article.

Overall Impressions:

Overall, the draft is impressive, offering valuable additional information to the original text. It is well-written, easy to comprehend, and supported by credible resources. Addressing repetition and adding images would further strengthen the article's quality and appeal.

By adding some images that would give visual details about the subject under discussion would significantly improve the quality of the article.