User:AnonStu10/Kobe Mosque/R72zzr Peer Review

General info
AnonStu10
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://w.wiki/A3LJ
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://w.wiki/A3LK

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: The start of the article is clear and helps introduce the main points well. Adding more detail can make it even easier for readers to understand.

Content: The information in the article is good for explaining the main topic without taking sides. It gives lots of details without being biased.

Tone and Balance: The article keeps a fair tone and presents information in a balanced way. This helps readers follow along easily.

Source and References: The article uses lots of different sources and references to back up the main points. This adds credibility and gives readers different viewpoints.

Organization: The article is divided into sections, which makes it easy to follow. Breaking up big paragraphs could make it even easier to read. The references are well-organized, which helps readers find more info easily.

Images and Media: There aren't any images, but adding some could make the article more visually appealing and helpful.

Overall Impressions: The article is heading in the right direction. It has good content and organization, and adding images and more detail could make it even better.