User:AnonymousJeffersonStudent/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Triple oppression

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article is interesting because it addresses a concept relevant to the social sciences and has a relationship with another important concept, interectionality. The article is a good start, but appears to need more to work to fully connect this concept to other related concepts and situate it within the appropriate fields.

Evaluate the article
The lead is very brief and the introductory sentence is not clear and concise. It does not incude a breif description of the sections of the article. The content is relevant, but can be explanded on. The content can be more coheively connected and shorter portions could be developed. The topic does relate to historically underrepresented populations. The article needs more thorough review than I have done so far, but it does seem to need development and my intial reading left me thinking that there are statements that may not be accurate or fully supported and the sources may need to be checked. There are no images and I'm not sure the topic has been brought fully into the present although it is a very compeling modern topic and concern. The article's discussion page has several comments. They generally seem to show that the article needs more development. There are references to subjects that appear to have been removed due to lack of relevance. One prominent issue is a comment on the lack of mentioning disability in relation to oppression. Someone commented that the abscence of that issue is due to it not being included in the original concept of Triple Oppression. However, it seems that there could be a section discussing howw the concept of triple oppression continues to be built on and include such topics as disability and the direction of these concepts going forward. Commentors seemed to notice some issues and acknowledge that they didn't always have the requisite knowledge on the topic. The article did not read as entirely neutral, it seemed in part due to how quotes were used in certain instances, such as with the word "othered" and "hatred", though they may be accurate, their placement isolated from later completion of the quotes comes across as questioining, but I am not sure if this is just my own interpretation.The article is rated C-Class. The article is a great staring point and would benefit from further development and clearer connections between the exisiting sections. ~