User:Anonymous - JJH 8/Agenda-setting theory/Izzyabella2003 Peer Review

General info
JJH 8
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Anonymous - JJH 8/Agenda-setting theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Agenda-setting theory

Evaluate the drafted changes
'''* The only added/edited sections to the existing article that I see in the Sandbox are in the "Three models of agenda-setting" section. The edits made to the "Application of agenda-setting theory for the study of various topics" section are just shortened summarized versions of what is already on the current Wikipedia page. Likewise, the "Comparison of agenda-setting with policy agenda-building" section is exactly the same as what is already on the Wikipedia page. In general, more content needs to be added and/or edited. *'''


 * The lead was not updated. The lead does not yet include a brief description of the articles’ major sections. The lead does not include information that is not present in the article. The lead is concise.
 * The content added was relevant to the topic. The content added was up-to-date. There is no content that is missing. The content does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.
 * The content added was neutral. There were no claims that appeared heavily biased toward a particular position. There are no viewpoints that are over or under-represented, and the content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.
 * All content added is backed up by a reliable, secondary source of information. The content accurately reflects what the cited sources say. The sources are thorough. The sources are current. There is only one newly added source.
 * The content added could be made more clear and concise. The content added has no grammatical or spelling errors. The contact added is broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic.
 * No images or media were added.
 * The content added does improve the overall quality of the article and the strength of the content is that it provides more detail to the three models of agenda setting.