User:Anonymous - JJH 8/Agenda-setting theory/Ses21f Peer Review

General info
User:Anonymous - JJH 8/Agenda-setting theory
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Anonymous - JJH 8/Agenda-setting theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think overall, this author made sufficient edits and added much more in-depth information to the article

Three models of agenda setting:. However, who is Max McCombs... what makes him relevant to this article and theory? I think the wording of the portion is a little informal. Each portion starts with the "simplest way," the most "detailed way." I think these phrases should be omitted since they are subjective and repetitive.

- "Most researches on agenda-setting" -> grammar error

Three types of agenda setting: This portion of the article I think is better than the previous. The author explains relevant research and theory origins, as well as those who created them with enough detail. I think media agenda needs to be expanded on. I think the policy agenda subsection is well written, as it defines what it is and how it has been seen in action through studies and research. However, I think there needs to be a citation of such studies.

Application of agenda-setting theory for the study of various topics: I think the separation of political and non-political environments where agenda-setting theory can be applied is important. However, I think the "twitter" subsection should be "political applications," with a then sub-section of "agenda setting on twitter." For the non-political application and agenda-setting through different categories of communications; more examples! I think adding an international perspective is important and commendable.

Overall, I think the changes and additions to the articles are pretty sufficient, but could expand and be more supported. The categorization and format is generally efficient, aside from the vague and incoherent separation and comparison of (non)political applications in agenda-setting theory. The tone is a bit informal and makes the information seem weak and lacking objectivity, Content-wise, again- examples might help.