User:Anonymous - JJH 8/Agenda-setting theory/Tallahasseesportscaster Peer Review

General info
Anonymous - JJH 8
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Anonymous - JJH 8/Agenda-setting theory
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Agenda-setting theory

Evaluate the drafted changes
There is no lead included on their sandbox, so looks like they're sticking with the original one. The content looks to be accurate, but could use more detail. For example, the sandbox lists the three models of agenda-setting and gives a brief 3 sentence description of each. Perhaps another source could be used to add examples of these models in action. The content of this article is highly objective, there doesn't appear to be any slant or bias. This article continues a great wealth of sources, but not all of them a recent. The newest one is from 2016, and 12 of the 18 are at least a decade old. It's possible that more recent work may be unavailable, but when it comes to agenda-setting I wonder if things have changed in the last 10-20 years. No images are included, but I'm not sure it would add to the article. Everything is well written and organized, use of bold text and headings helps to easily find what you're looking for at a glance. If the authors are looking to provide a very brief synopsis of their topics, than the article is effective. But it looks like more could be added to the models and types of agenda-setting.