User:Anonymous microbe/Bacillus cereus/Aetilghman Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Y'all have lots of great references! All of your work so far is strong, well-written, concise, and organized. Very impressed with the work you have done so far. Some suggestions for improvement could be to include one or a few more images of your bacteria. I know there are already two images of your bacteria, so take this comment with a grain of salt.

Additionally, I would suggest breaking up the pathogen section into smaller, more bite sized sections. Organizing this section more effectively will greatly contribute to a smoother read.

Consider also removing the diagnosis section because it repeats the same information in the pathogen section and leave the Identification section as is.

All of the information written in your sandbox is strong. Overall, you are doing a great job on this article! I hope my comments are helpful - feel free to use or disregard as you see fit. Good luck writing!