User:Anonymous microbe/Bacillus cereus/Meghanherlitzka Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Anonymous microbe, Is73500, Danimahoney, Jmoyang58


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Bacillus cereus
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

The lead appears to be somewhat updated but could use a little more information that relates to later sections of the article regarding the "diagnosis" and "characteristics" sections. A brief description of these two sections would make the article stronger and more coherent. The lead is not overly detailed and gets to the main points concerning Bacillus cereus.

Content:

The content covers nearly all necessary sections in my opinion, however more information could be added to many of the sections. The "In agriculture" section, the "Reproduction" section, and the "Diseases" section all likely have more data that could be included to make for a stronger depiction of Bacillus cereus. Based on the citations, the content is up to date.

Tone/Balance:

The content appears to be neutral without any heavily biased claims to my knowledge. The content does not persuade the reader, but more content could be added to better inform the reader.

Sources/References:

There are a lot of reliable sources cited at the end of the article, which goes to show it is a well established and researched article. All the links work to my knowledge. The sources are current and seem to have reputable authors.

Organization:

Some of the content could be rewritten to be more clear. Overall, the content is organized.

Images/Media:

More images should be added if they exist. It would strengthen the article and description of Bacillus cereus.