User:Anonymousardvark/Social media and identity/Wikistudent100 Peer Review

General info
Anonymousardvark
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Anonymousardvark/Social media and identity
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Social media and identity

Lead

 * As of today, the sandbox does not reflect any updates to the articles lead section.

Content

 * Added content is relevant to the topic.
 * Added content is up-to-date.
 * There is missing information, but the editor has identified where information needs to be added.
 * The article seems to mention how this issue disproportionally effects women.

Tone and Balance

 * All claims seemed to be informed by the cited sources
 * The information seems non-biased and not attempting to persuade readers.

Sources and References

 * A majority of sources were published within the last 10 years, which is good for relevancy. They also seem thorough and well rounded.
 * The links work!

Organization

 * Content seems well organized if a little sporadic as new information is consistantly being added.
 * It could probably be broken down into more sub-sections

Images and Media

 * No images or media yet

Overall impressions
It seems great! Someone is putting hard work into editing this article and it seems to be going well. My only advice would be to refine information blocks into sub-sections.