User:Anonymousecat/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Pharmacology

Chemical biology

Crystal chemistry

Option 1

 * Article title::Pharmacology:
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article has content that is relevant to the topic. There are many extensive subtopics in the article, as the term "pharmacology" is quite broad. However, some topics are more extensive than others. For example, under "theory of pharmacology", both the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics sections require improvement. Both have very detailed explanations of the field that could simply be linked. It should focus more on the broader/general study of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with links to what is being currently in the article.
 * The article is written in a neutral tone, without trying to convince the reader in a biased opinion in most sections of the article. However, some sections like the societies and education section try to convince the reader of a specific career decision without a source: "Pharmacologists, however, usually work in a laboratory undertaking research or development of new products."
 * Each claim doesn't have a citation. Entire sections (Societies and education, pharmacodynamics) don't have a single citation within them.
 * The list of citations seem to be up to date, and from reliable sources such as academic journals with many citations.
 * Sources
 * https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/drug-products/fact-sheets/drug-identification-number.html
 * https://www.dh.gov.hk/english/useful/useful_registration/useful_registration.html
 * https://www.medikredit.co.za/products-and-services/nappi/
 * https://www.who.int/tools/atc-ddd-toolkit/methodology#:~:text=The%20ATC%20classification%20system%20groups,linked%20to%20the%20ATC%20code.
 * https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/medi-span/about/gpi
 * https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/medi-span/about/gpi

Option 2

 * Article title::Chemical Biology:
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic, with a general description of the field, research areas within the field, and education within the field. However, I don't think the "The University of British Columbia, for example, offers a fourth-year course in synthetic chemical biology." is necessary, as that is a very specific example. Instead, the first university that offered the undergraduate degree, as well as adding a masters degree section is more fitting.
 * The article is written neutrally, without trying to convince the reader of any biased opinion.
 * Each claim seems to be supported with citations in most places. However, some parts of the article references research work without proper citations.
 * The list of citations are up to date, and are from reliable sources such as academic journals with many citations.


 * Sources
 * https://www.stevens.edu/program/chemical-biology-bachelor-degree
 * https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00461
 * https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00461

Option 3

 * Article title::Crystal Chemistry:
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic, but are not expanded upon; Ideas are mentioned but not discussed. The grammar is not correct, there are capitalization problems as well as punctuation problems. History of the field of chemistry could also be something to be discussed, with reference to prior crystal chemistry papers. The "topics studied are:..." could be a part of a 'current works in the field' section, separating it from when crystal chemistry was first established. There could also be more information on the different types of crystal chemistry, such as "rich" and "liquid" crystal chemistry, mineralogical crystal chemistry, high temperature/pressure crystal chemistry etc.
 * The organization of the article could be improved upon, as there aren't any subtopics. The description of the field (the lead paragraph) could have a section, history of the field could have its own, research areas could have its own, and many more compartmentalization would enhance the readerss understanding of the topic. Additionally, there are no pictures present in the article; pictures and visual aid is recommended to enhance the readers' understanding.
 * The article is not written with a neutral tone. It suggests that there are "objectives" of the field of study, which I think could be worded differently. For example, it could just be an explanation of what the field of study usually
 * Some of the links in the article are non-existent.
 * There is no citation in the article. No statements are supported.
 * Additionally, the entire lead paragraph is copy and pasted from the encyclopedia without a citation.


 * Sources
 * Sources


 * https://academic-accelerator.com/encyclopedia/crystal-chemistry
 * https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-39312-4_318
 * https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/ammin/article-abstract/69/7-8/601/104855/An-orbital-interpretation-of-Pauling-s-rules
 * "An Introduction to Crystal Chemistry" By R. C. Evans

Option 4

 * Article title:I may or may not do more
 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?


 * Sources:
 * Sources:

Option 5

 * Article title:
 * Article Evaluation:
 * Sources: