User:Anoopnil/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Pre-crime
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead is very succinct. It's almost too succinct and doesn't give enough information about pre-crime. The content of the article is also quite limited and the page doesn't have much information other than the references to pop culture of its origin as well as a link to the collateral consequences of criminal conviction. The tone has no bias which is good. The sources are varied and range from 1975 to 2016. There are a lot of sources from the same people though, so there is need to increase and diversify it to meet the needs of a good article. Right now it's rated as a C-class which means that there's a substantial amount of room for improvement. The article's organization is solid. There's one image representing the theory of crime, but it doesn't make much sense. The talk page gives really good evaluations for the page reiterating what I stated earlier while also saying the article talks more about post-crime rather than pre-crime making it unnecessary to exist. Pre-crime is important and is most likely an imminent issue to discuss, but the information on it is not enough to pursue making it not a good article to expand on for this project or as a Wiki article in general.
 * Sources
 * Dick, Philip K. (2002), "Minority Report", In: Minority Report, London, 1-43. See The Minority Report

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Women's property rights
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead is strong and concise setting up what should be a good article. That turns out not to be the case due to the C-class rating. The content of the article is relatively thin. It touches upon the various things listed in the table of contents, but doesn't really expand on it and dig into the gender bias and inequality that is the root of even the discussion of women's property rights. This article does fit into Wikipedia's equity goals which is why it probably hasn't been deleted yet. The tone is solid and doesn't reveal any major biases. The sources are actually quite solid and varied which makes the lack of information and further discussion confusing. It seems to be more so an incomplete article rather than a bad one. No images or media present. This could be a viable article to choose. It fulfills the equity gap and has a load of information to add.
 * Sources
 * Deere, Carmen Diana; Doss, Cheryl R. (2008), "Gender and the distribution of wealth in developing countries", in Davies, James B. (ed.), Personal wealth from a global perspective, Oxford New York: Oxford University Press (UNU-WIDER), pp. 353–372, ISBN 9780199548897

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Economic inequality
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead is descriptive in general terms of economic inequality, but has issues with being slightly vague and not really setting up the rest of the article. This article has been given a C-class rating. The content of the article is wide and varied which is good. However, there are sections that need to be improved such as the descriptions of Malthusian economics which can help explain economic inequality at its most basic level. The organization of the article is straightforward and makes sense with the content. The tone is not biased. The content is so much that the talk page has recently discussed splitting this article into which would be causes of economic inequality and effects of economic inequality. The sources are a definite strength with sources coming from all over and from many demographics to create a relevant international article. However, some of the sources are not open source. This article has a lot of potential and lots of content to work with and revise.
 * Sources
 * Hatch, Megan E.; Rigby, Elizabeth (2015). "Laboratories of (In)equality? Redistributive Policy and Income Inequality in the American States". Policy Studies Journal. 43 (2): 163–187. doi:10.1111/psj.12094.
 * Becker, Gary S.; Murphy, Kevin M. (May 2007). "The Upside of Income Inequality". The America. Archived from the original on January 2, 2014.
 * Hunt, Michael (2004). The World Transformed: 1945 to the Present. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's. pp. 442. ISBN 978-0312245832.

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Energy in Tunisia
 * Article Evaluation
 * The lead is one sentence and lacks any description. The content does discuss the various sources of energy in Tunisia, but fails to go in-depth on any of them and there is a plethora of information available on the subject based on the sources in the UB library directory. The organization for the limited content is good. The sources are numerous, but it looks like some are just news articles which could mean the content has a bias that's not evident by just looking at the tone of the article. The article does fall under the UN goals and would provide filling for the Wiki equity gap. The article has an S-class rating so I can do a substantial overhaul of it. The talk page also has nothing about the subject meaning this will give me full control of the article.
 * Sources
 * Lehr, Mönnig. “Employment from Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency in Tunisia – New Insights, New Results.” Energy Procedia, vol. 93, Elsevier Ltd, Aug. 2016, pp. 223–28, doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.174.
 * Wafi, Ben Othman. “Qualitative and Quantitative Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste and the Unexploited Potential of Green Energy in Tunisia.” Bioresources and Bioprocessing, vol. 6, no. 1, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Oct. 2019, pp. 1–16, doi:10.1186/s40643-019-0274-4.
 * Fodha, Zaghdoud. “Decomposition Analysis of Aggregate Energy Intensity Changes in Tunisia over the Period 1980–2007.” Environmental Modeling & Assessment, vol. 20, no. 5, Springer International Publishing, Oct. 2015, pp. 509–20, doi:10.1007/s10666-015-9460-8.

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources