User:Anoopnil/Energy in Tunisia/Vechilco Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Analzying anoopnil
 * User:Anoopnil/Energy in Tunisia

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * I didn't see a lead in his article, so he either didn't add to the pre-existing one, or he should include a brief section describing what his article will contain.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * All of the content is extremely relevant and the sources are current and up to date.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The content is neutral and almost entirely factual information.
 * There are a lot of numbers and statistics, but overall it doesn't take away the meaning of the writing.
 * There is no persuasion happening, just the statement of facts.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * There are sources tagged throughout the piece, but it would be nice to have some more sources to back up the information.
 * The sources are current and reflect the actuality of the situation.
 * There are only two sources, so it might be good to have one or two more, but they seem factual.
 * The links work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The content is split up nicely into sections, making it not overwhelming and very easy to read.
 * The content is concise and there are little to no grammatical or spelling errors.
 * It contains only a few sentences per paragraph, which gives it a more appealing look.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * No images or media were added.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?