User:Ansleyb/Hope Barrett/Madd2022 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am reviewing the work of Ansleyb.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ansleyb/Hope_Barrett?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead
At the time of this review, Ansley doesn't quite include a traditional "lead" section, but the biography portion of the Wikipedia page that she leads with provides a clear, concise introduction as to who Hope Barrett is and what elements will be covered within the article.

Content
The added content to Ansley's page is relevant to the topic and up-to-date. All of the information included seems to belong. The article does address topics related to historically underrepresented populations - namely queer women.

Tone and Balance
Ansley's content is neutral in tone and remains unbiased towards any one person. The article seems to accurately and equally represent the viewpoints of Hope Barrett's career without seeming to "persuade" the reader in any one way or another.

Sources and References
Hope Barrett's article presents a diverse array of current sources that are accurately used within the article itself.

Organization
The article is well organized and concise. The structure of the page is clear and easy to read. I don't see any grammatical or spelling errors. The page is broken down into sections that make sense in terms of Hope Barrett's career.

Images and Media
There are no images or media present in Hope Barrett's article.

Overall Impressions
The article seems to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines with multiple notable names linked and referenced within the article itself. The sources seem to be a fairly exhaustive list that appears to be representative of Hope Barrett's career and all of the available sources on her.