User:Antaeus Feldspar/COFS


 * 17:51, 25 April 2007 - With misleading edit summary "minor detail", adds allegation that Tory Christman "credited" Heldal-Lund with convincing her to leave her husband.
 * 22:10, 25 April 2007 - Restores that along with other poor information.
 * 22:34, 25 April 2007 - Edit summary "added ref". Adds supposed reference for above claim.  "Reference" is to Religious Freedom Watch, in no way shape or form a reliable source.  Far from supporting the allegation against Heldal-Lund it does not mention him in any way.


 * 17:59, 13 April 2007 - Edit summary "Undid revision 122601528. Nope. Your sysadmin at Loyola University Chicago would not like it." Gratuitous volunteering of another editor's personal information.


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology&diff=next&oldid=122591005 - Edit summary "Scientology and psychiatry - rv vandalism". Removes correct and cited information that Hubbard blamed psychiatrists for the invention of pain and sex eons ago, replacing "psychiatrists" with "evil beings".


 * (edit not yet located) -- claims "In later research the Sunday Times in UK (1969) found out that Hubbard's contact to O.T.O. had been an intelligence operation for the U.S. Government to prevent leaks of confidential information to O.T.O. (midst of the Cold War Parsons was working as a solid fuel rocket scientist in California" (emphasis added.) Added description is absolutely false -- [http://www.xenu-directory.net/news/images/19691228-uk-thesundaytimes-wl.gif the source" begins "The Church of Scientology has sent us the following information" and then puts all subsequent information in quotes.  Not a word is said to support the idea that any "later research" was performed that supported the Church's claim.


 * misdescribing legitimate edits as "vandalism"
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology&diff=122586155&oldid=122579699
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology&diff=next&oldid=122586155
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology&diff=next&oldid=122587664
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology&diff=next&oldid=122587989
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology&diff=next&oldid=122588504
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology&diff=next&oldid=122589804
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology&diff=next&oldid=122590149
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology&diff=next&oldid=122590617
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology&diff=next&oldid=122591005
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientology&diff=next&oldid=122591176


 * Inflates an article from ~9K to ~40K in a single edit with primarily irrelevant material copy-pasted from newspaper articles:


 * Implies that non-Scientologists who edit Scientology articles are on drugs: ("Are you gay?" (for exclusion from gay articles), "Are you black?" (for exclusion or at least less rights when editing Civil War articles) ... "Are you on drugs when editing Wikipedia?" (for super-user rights in Scientology articles).)


 * addition of poor-quality external link, same as on Free Zone (Scientology). Check timing.