User:AnthonyIPA/sandbox

= Article Evaluation = I'm choosing to evaluate an article titled Great Peace of Montreal, a C-class article which both intrigued me and had room for improvement.

Article notes:
 * Article is well constructed, and relevant to the topic. Nothing out of the ordinary to distract from the article.  On occasions some articles are bombarded with pictures and illustrations distracting from the content, not this one.  Well laid out with the information first.
 * The article is presented in a neutral standpoint. Neither favoring either side of the Great Peace Treaty.  This is a good thing for the article, but I'm not so sure about my assignment.  Having a biased position could help me identify an early edit.
 * Upon reading the article several times, I'm finding it difficult to find viewpoints that would be considered over or underrepresented. However in the second paragraph titled "Fur Wars"  gives a brief description of the conflict.  After reading the sub-article, perhaps more content could have been provided to further elaborate the conflict.
 * Citations and links do work as directed, with the sources supporting the claims.
 * From what I can differentiate all facts come from a reliable source. No blogs or newspaper articles listed.  I cannot determine if the sources are neutral, but there is several sources in the article.
 * The information presented is current, ongoing editing has been continuous with is last one being less than 2 weeks ago.
 * After review the Talk page, there were multiple discussions about the content of the article. Several of the contributors were discussing some "biased" content and why it was removed.
 * Article is rated a "C-class" and is involved in several Wikipedia projects.
 * Wikipedia dives right into the topics discussed, and rightfully so as this is an Encyclopedia, whereas in class the information is incorporated over time.