User:AnthonyP21/sandbox

Article Evaluation The vast majority of the facts and the references in the article New Public administration boast undeniable credibility. The article also has a concise focus those features intricate details that highlight the subject. The article features an unparalleled biasness that gives it a factual dimension that isn’t diluted by compromising opinions. The information comes from professional and scholarly sources that respected experts in the field have extensively checked the subject matter. The sources that contribute to the paper hold true to the fabric of the article, the sources are neutral and simply report the facts of the development of non-traditional public administration. The critical viewpoints described in the article aren’t over presented or under presented there is a finite balance that cohesively presents the facts and reveals the development of a modern system. After reviewing a number of citations I noticed that there are numerous instances of close paraphrasing but all these paraphrased excerpts were properly cited and had no identifiable error and held true to citation regulations. The New Public Administration article while very fluid was accurate in the specific dates and times listed throughout the article. Another attribute of the article was its clear and concise feature segment that gave the article a unique dynamic of easy understandability. While the New Public Administration is a subject foreign to many minds the accessible language made the article seem to appear as basic knowledge. This feature not only sets a fundamental understanding for aspiring public administrators but a beacon of empowerment to the public at large.