User:AntiPrivet123/Amorpha georgiana/Gopherfrog47 Peer Review

General info
Antiprivet123
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AntiPrivet123/Amorpha georgiana
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Amorpha georgiana

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

In this case, since the original article was just the lead, keeping that same lead makes sense. It's concise and easy to understand, mentioning that it is fire-adapted seems a little out of place since no other specific details are given. I also don't think you need to mention the long leaf pine ecosystem is endangered in the lead, move it down. Beyond that, I think you could add another sentence about the threats the false indigo is facing.

I really like how informative but concise your Current populations section is. The wording is just a little clunky, I would change it to something more like, "Currently, there are only 14 known populations of A. georgiana, all located in the US Southeast. North Carolina has 10, South Carolina has three, and Georgia has only one." Totally your call. I'd also switch the formatting from individual lines in a paragraph.

Threats section looks great! I love the extra detail on fire supression, but I think you could expand of the impacts of habitat degradation and urbanization. I'd also add more hyperlinks to the scientific terms, and at least one more source.

Similar to threats, I think you have a lot of good information in your Conservation Strategies tab, I'd just expand into a couple other strategies besides prescribed burning.

Overall, I think this is a really strong draft! In addition to the section specific feedback, I think this article could really benefit from more sources and hyperlinks. I'd recommend bringing over the two sources on the original article to start. Besides that, some of the spacing is inconsistent between sections, and the article needs an "Article Body" heading after the Lead.