User:Antitheto/sandbox

= Article Evaluation = All the information found in the article I read about Radiolaria was relevant to the topic. Some of the information was from some time before the 1980s, with one reference to the expedition of the HMS Challenger in the 1800s, but considering the somewhat limited information associated with the topic, I won't complain. Overall, the only improvement I could find would be possibly better illustrations or pictures of the Radiolaria, but I understand the limitations as most images of the small creatures are copyrighted in papers and other literature.

The article itself is neutral, presenting the information in a way that seems to have no alternative interests in mind. No viewpoints are over pressed or underrepresented.

Each of the citations I tested on the page worked properly and took my directly to the source of the information. Each fact seems to be appropriately cited and referenced in the citations. Each of the sources is either a scientific journal or a personal publication, which would be the only case of potentially biased information in the article. The conversations about the topic seem to represent concerns in the scientific community, as would be expected. One example would be the proper name of the Radiolaria, while another would be an example of their normal size range.

The article seems to be valued, showing great importance marked on the page. It is part of two WikiProjects, including Palaeontology and Microbiology.

Topic Ideas
I've chosen the following 3 topic ideas from the Phylum Radiolaria.

Genus Aulosphaera

Family Stylosphaeridae

Genus Cornutella

All three choices are good. - Josh