User:Aobessette/2020 Togolese presidential election/Kateim Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Aobessette
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Togolese_presidential_election

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * The lead summarizes who won the 2020 Togolese elections. It doesn't talk or introduce the other political parties that are mentioned later.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * It talks about when the elections were held.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No it does't mention the suspension of the presidential election.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is consise but I think it would be better if more information was included.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * The content added is very relevant and covers the election.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * The content is very up-to-date as this election was held in February 2020.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I think that the writer can add more content.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes all the information is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * The writer uses African news soures.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * I'm suspecting that the writer cannot use literature sources because the election was too recent.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * For https://www.panapress.com/Togolese-to-vote-in-presidential-a_630617927-lang2.html, I was not able to access the information on the link. Your other links work and support your data.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes, the images are great.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * The images mention how
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * I think so. They're from newspapers.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes.

For New Articles Only (this article is not a new article)
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * The article is very short and mostly consisting of electoral information.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * I really love the images and graphs you provided on your Wikipedia page! It makes the information easier to understand and digest since electoral numbers are usually cut and dry. Your article is also unbiased and neutral.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * I think to improve your page, you might want to consider bringing in information from prior to the 2020 election and bringing in historical context or information to help the reader contextualize the importance of the election. By reading your article alone, I am not sure if incumbent president Faure Gnassingbé of the Union for the Republic won by a truly fair election. Were there any issues of corruption? You mentioned there were electoral reforms in early 2020, I think it would be good if you elaborated on that issue. And I'm also interested why there were so many blank and invalid votes this election because 963,413 is a large number of voters.