User:Aodum58/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cancel culture

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I have researched this topic before and I found it very interesting since cancel culture is mainly catered to newer generations. While I was researching I saw that there was a lot of information that I did not even touch and I want to see what all is in that infomation.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead Section:

This article has an introductory sentence that gives the reader a good sense of the articles topics. The lead provides a brief but clear description of the articles major topics, its grabbing and provides all the necessary information that will be further discussed. The lead comes off a bit detailed but not overbearing to where it didn't make sense.

Content:

The articles content is relevant to the topic, up to date and has all of the necessary information needed to convey its message. Cancel Culture provides detailed descriptions of the equity gaps such as the minorities affected by it. A historically underrepresented topic they discuss is being shunned/rejecting in the past.

Tone and Balance:

This articles neutral, there are no claims that seem biased toward one side. For the most part all the viewpoints that were representing well. The viewpoint of minorities are described and portrayed accurately.

Sources and References:

Most if not all points were followed by citation of a reliable secondary source. The sources used in this article are thorough, even though not all sources are current. The article is written by a diverse group of authors, so there is an array of different viewpoints. The links provided in the article work and allow you to go to them.

Organization and Writing Quality:

This article is well written and very detailed I would not say that it's concise, but it is clear and easy to read. There are a some grammatical errors. The article is well organized its very clear when one section ends and the other starts and reflects major points in the article.

Images and Media:

This article uses images to enhance the understanding of the topics being discussed yet you have to hover the link to make them visible. The pictures are well captioned, they provide definitions, summaries, background info, etc... The images used adhere to wikipedias copyright regulations.

Talk Page discussion:

Personally I did not see any conversations going on, on the talk page. The way wikipedia describes the concept of cancel culture is different yet the same in specific aspects from when I learned about it in class.