User:Apers0n/Naturopathy

Naturopathy) is a philosophy and practice within alternative medicine that seeks to improve  health and restore health of the whole person chiefly by assisting the body's innate capacity to recover from  illness and  injury. Naturopathic practice may include a broad array of different modalities, including  manual therapy,  homeopathy,  hydrotherapy,  herbalism,  acupuncture, counselling,  environmental medicine,  aromatherapy, wholefoods, and so on. Practitioners have a holistic approach to patient care.

The naturopathic movement has its origins in the United States, where there are two types of practitioner: licensed naturopathic physicians practising  naturopathic medicine, and traditional naturopaths. Before origination of the term "naturopathy", this medical system was used in European clinics and spas as part of mainstream medicine. Today naturopathy is practiced in many countries around the world in one form or another, where it is subject to different standards of regulation and levels of acceptance.

Naturopaths are not licensed to use invasive surgery, or prescribe synthetic drugs, but some may use "natural" remedies, i.e. relatively unprocessed or whole medications herbs and foods. Some naturopaths are trained to use diagnostic tests such as imaging and  blood tests before deciding upon the full course of treatment. Where clinically indicated, naturopaths may refer out to medical practitioners for prescription medications and surgery.

The mainstream scientific community claims that it has found little evidence for the effectiveness of most naturopathic modalities, and the concept of holistic medicine itself is widely disputed. Alternative medicine is often treated warily, as when a treatment is proven to be effective, it is usually integrated into mainstream medicine. Naturopathy is thereby sometimes dismissed as ineffective by those who see it as an alternative therapy rather than a medical system.

History of naturopathy
The term naturopathy was coined in the US before 1900, by John Scheel, and used by  Benedict Lust. Lust had been schooled in hydrotherapy and other natural health practices in  Germany by Father  Sebastian Kneipp,  who sent Lust to the  United States to bring them Kneipp's methods. In 1905, Lust founded the American School of Naturopathy in  New York, the first naturopathic college in the United States.

Naturopathic medicine went into decline, along with most other natural health professions, after the 1930s, with the discovery of penicillin and advent of synthetic drugs such as antibiotics and  corticosteroids. In the post-war era, Lust's death, conflict between various schools of natural medicine ( homeopathy,  eclectics,  physio-medicalism,  herbalism, naturopathy, etc.), the rise of medical technology, and consolidation of political power in conventional medicine were all contributing factors. In 1910, when the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching published the  Flexner Report which criticized many aspects of medical education in various institutions (natural and conventional), it was mostly seen as an attack on low-quality natural medicine education. It caused many such programs to shut down and contributed to the popularity of conventional medicine.

Naturopathic medicine never completely ceased to exist, however, as there were always a few states in which licensing laws existed—though at one point there were virtually no schools. One of the most visible steps towards the profession's modern renewal was the opening in 1956 of the National College of Naturopathic Medicine in  Portland, Oregon. This was the first of the modern naturopathic medical schools offering four-year naturopathic medical training with the intention of integrating mainstream science and naturopathic principles and practice.

Naturopathy In India
Naturopathy has another stream that started in India in the 1900s. It was popularized by Mahatma Gandhi. He adopted and popularized this system because it was cheap and adaptable to the Indian soil. The system grew in popularity towards the close of 1900s, and today there are two streams of naturopaths in India. The first are graduates of All India Naturopathy Council and are awarded DNYS (Diploma in Naturopathy and Yogic Sciences) after 3 years of guided study and internship. The other are university graduates who are awarded BNYS (Bachelor of Naturopathy and Yogic Sciences). BNYS is a four and half year course with one year internship. BNYS course is offered by Government Gandhi Nature Cure College, Hyderabad, India, affiliated to NTR University of Health Sciences.

Naturopathy is very popular in India, and there are numerous naturopathy hospitals in the country. There are also many doctors trained in the Western system of medicine who have acquired naturopathy degrees so as to integrate the insights gained into their system of practice.

The Indian stream of naturopathy differs from the Western stream in many ways, particularly in their emphasis of strict vegetarianism and  yoga.

Naturopathic physicians and traditional naturopaths
There are two groups in the United States calling themselves "naturopaths" who have recently been engaged in legal battles. The term when originally coined by John Scheel, and popularized by Dr.  Benedict Lust was to apply to those receiving an education in the basic medical sciences with an emphasis on natural therapies:
 * Naturopathic physicians
 * "Traditional" naturopaths

Naturopathic physicians
Naturopathic physicians in the United States are independent providers with training in conventional medical sciences, diagnosis and treatment, and natural therapeutics with licenses or registration granted by an individual state Naturopathic Board of Medical Examiners. They graduate from four-year nationally accredited naturopathic medical graduate schools. Naturopathic physicians training with respect to modalities is different, with a focus on nutrition,  botanical medicine,  homeopathy,  hydrotherapy,  physical manipulation,  pharmacology, and  minor surgery. Some naturopathic physicians have additional training in the following: natural childbirth,  acupuncture, and  Chinese medicine. These subspecialties often involve additional years of study. Naturopathic physicians are required to attend continuing education yearly in order to maintain and renew their license.

Traditional Naturopaths
Vis medicatrix naturae, or the healing power of nature, is the central tenet of Traditional Naturopathy. Bacteria and viruses, which are always present, seldom cause problems in a healthy body. According to naturopathic practice, disease occurs when toxins that have accumulated internally – often due to incorrect lifestyle, a poor diet, and improper care of the body - weaken a person. While conventional medical treatments may rid the body of symptoms, these treatments alone do not bring about true healing. Rather than trying to attack specific symptoms and diseases, Traditional Naturopathy offers a holistic approach to the individual that supports the body in finding its way back to  homeostasis.

Traditional Naturopathy is not a medical practice. While prescribing drugs and pharmaceuticals, performing surgery, and other invasive procedures clearly have their place in the hands of properly trained medical doctors, these practices are outside the scope of Traditional Naturopathy and are at odds with its fundamental principles. Instead Traditional Naturopaths focus on educating clients to lead healthier lives and on the use of naturopathic modalities such as light,  water,  herbs, healthy foods, and  exercise to  cleanse and strengthen the body and support its natural healing process.

Traditional Naturopaths receive training from correspondence schools, or they receive their training from other practitioners. None of the schools that award degrees to Traditional Naturopaths are accredited by the US Department of Education.

The Principles of Naturopathic Medicine
Naturopathy is based on six tenets or principles :
 * 1) "The healing power of  nature"
 * 2) "Identify and treat the cause"
 * 3) "First do no harm"
 * 4) "Treat the whole person"
 * 5) "The physician as  teacher"
 * 6) " Prevention"

"The healing power of nature"
The healing power of nature (vis medicatrix naturae), has two aspects: first that the body has the ability to  heal itself and it is the naturopathic doctor's role to facilitate this natural process, and second that  nature heals. Following this principle includes getting enough sleep, exercising, feeding the body nutritional  food and, if needed, additional earth food, such as  herbs, or  algae, which is a living  organism. It is asserted, yet strongly refuted by critics, that plants can gently move the body into health without side effects posed by some synthetic chemicals in modern pharmaceuticals.

"Identify and treat the cause"
The underlying root causes of disease must be removed for complete healing to take place (tolle causam). These root causes can exist at many levels: physical,  mental,  emotional, and  spiritual. It is the naturopathic doctor's ostensible role to identify this root cause, in addition to alleviate suffering by treating symptoms.

"First do no harm"
The process of healing includes the manifestations of symptoms, so that any therapy that interferes with this natural healing process by masking symptoms is considered suppressive and should be avoided (primum non nocere). The natural life force of the individual should be supported to facilitate healing.

"Treat the whole person"
A core tenet of naturopathy is the belief that health must go beyond treatment of immediate symptoms (as with  medicine), and instead treat the entire person's well being. That means treating the entire body, as well as the  spirit/  soul and  mind. This approach is usually called the wholistic or holistic method.

"The physician as teacher"
It is the role of the naturopath to educate an individual in their practices and encourage that individual to "take responsibility for their own health" (docere). This cooperative relationship between doctor and patient is essential to healing.

"Prevention"
The ultimate goal of the naturopathic physician is prevention. The emphasis is on building health, not fighting illness. This is done by fostering healthy lifestyles, healthy  beliefs, and healthy relationships.

Regulation
In some countries naturopathy is unregulated and the term "naturopath" is not clearly defined. This may lead to difficulty in ensuring that a practitioner is trained to a particular standard or has adequate liability insurance.

Regulation in Australia
There is currently no state licensure in  Australia, rather the industry is self regulated. There is no protection of title, meaning that technically anyone can practise as a naturopath. The only way to obtain insurance for professional  indemnity or public liability is by joining a professional association, which can only be achieved having completed an accredited course and gaining  professional certification.

It is generally thought that with registration, a minimum four-year degree with a minimum 400 hours of supervised clinic practice will be required for practice. Currently only two institutions fulfil these requirements, the Australian College of Natural Medicine and Southern Cross University.

Professional naturopathic associations in Australia include: There is currently debate in the industry over whether compulsory registration should be introduced for naturopaths, as with physiotherapy,  osteopathy and  chiropractic. ATMS is opposed on the grounds that naturopathic treatment is potentially dangerous, and that registration would therefore instigate a significant rise in insurance premiums. NHAA is pro-registration on the grounds that herbalists and naturopaths will never be taken seriously by the medical profession while unregistered. ANPA is also pro-registration, arguing that only registration of the profession will advance naturopathy as an integral part of healthcare in Australia.
 * Australian Natural Therapists Association (ANTA)
 * Australian Traditional-Medicine Society (ATMS), which has the largest membership base in the industry
 * National Herbalists Association of Australia (NHAA)
 * Australian Naturopathic Practitioners Association (ANPA)

Regulation in North America
Jurisdictions that currently regulate naturopathic medicine include:
 * U.S. jurisdictions with full licensure: Alaska,  Arizona,  California,  Connecticut,  District of Columbia,  Hawaii,  Idaho,  Maine,  Montana,  Vermont,  New Hampshire,  Oregon,  U.S. Virgin Islands,  Utah,  Washington
 * U.S. state with registration for naturopathic physicians: Kansas
 * U.S. jurisdictions with two-tier licensure: Puerto Rico
 * U.S. states with legal basis for practice: Minnesota,  Rhode Island
 * U.S. states which specifically prohibit the practice of naturopathy: South Carolina,  Tennessee
 * Canadian provinces with full licensure: British Columbia,  Manitoba,  Ontario,  Saskatchewan

Regulation in the United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom, naturopathy as a profession is very closely aligned with  osteopathy. There is no government sponsored regulation of the profession, the largest body, The General Council & Register of Naturopaths recognises three courses in the UK, two being taught at osteopathic schools: the British College of Osteopathic Medicine; The College of Osteopaths Educational Trust; and one at the University of Westminster School of Integrated Health under the auspices of the B.Sc Health Science (Naturopathy) course.

Members of this register will either have completed a three or four year full time degree level course or possibly be a healthcare professional (Medical Doctor, Osteopath, Chiropractor, Nurse) who has completed a two year post-graduate Naturopathic Diploma, the N.D. As the naturopathic profession has developed along different lines in the UK, naturopaths do not perform minor surgery or have prescribing rights.

Scope of practice
In the United States both naturopathic physicians and traditional naturopaths use the degree designation of N.D. (doctor of naturopathic medicine), leading to considerable confusion about the scope of practice, education and training of a naturopathic practitioner (in the United Kingdom, N.D. stands for Diploma in Naturopathy). There is great contention between the two factions, as their political agendas are in opposition to each other: Naturopathic physicians, whose national professional organization is the American Association of Naturopathic Physicians, strive to recover  licensure in all 50 states, whereas traditional naturopaths, whose professional organization is the American Naturopathic Medical Association, oppose licensure and often block licensing attempts. Negotiation is currently in progress between naturopathic physicians and traditional naturopaths to come to a resolution to this problem and agree to use different degree titles and designations, but so far this has not been a successful endeavour.

Science and naturopathy
There is widespread support for the application of an evidence based medicine framework to assess health outcomes and that systematic reviews with strict protocols are essential. Organisations such as the Cochrane Collaboration and Bandolier publish such reviews.

There are reports of evidence based medicine trials published for naturopathy.

Some modalities used in naturopathy are widely regarded as pseudoscience. Medical doctors often cite the large differences between naturopathic practitioners and the lack of scientific documentation of the safety and efficacy of their practices in order to justify limiting naturopathic scope. Advocates claim that naturopathic practitioners find it difficult to obtain financing for research due to the lack of prior research in many areas. Proponents state that this is slowly changing as naturopathic physicians develop research programs to help build up a foundation for evidence based treatment.

Conventional medicine is required to undergo rigorous testing; drug trials often last for a decade. A criticism of alternative therapies is that they are not subject to detailed safety assessment. Retrospective analysis of various herbal agents have found many to be of little therapeutic value and others to be harmful. This can be tied to the fact that 'natural' does not necessarily correspond to being beneficial or even benign. Also of concern is the ambiguity of the word "natural" and poor agreement as to its meaning.

While the above addresses a primary challenge to the validation process for "natural" remedies, perhaps of greater concern amongst critics is the lack of regulation of manufacturer claims in advertising. Common labeling practices suggest that herbal extracts are devoid of "drugs" or "chemicals". Claims of this type are patently false as every component of any plant extract is a chemical by definition. Likewise, claims as to the relative absence of toxicity in herbal extracts, when compared to conventional  pharmaceutical preparations, are tainted by incongruent regulations for reporting of side effects. The manufacturers of conventional pharmaceutical agents are legally bound to record and report any perceived negative experiences during large scale clinical trials, though there may be no actual link between the tested drug and the perceived side effect. To wit, it is often the case that drugs are labelled with side effects such as headache,  constipation,  diarrhea, or sleep disturbance. These "side effects" are required to be listed even if they are found with no more regularity than they are in a placebo control group or within the general populace for that matter. Conversely, herbal manufacturers are not required to carry out such clinical studies nor to report any known adverse effects, even if said effects have been directly linked to ingestion of the herbal preparation in question. While these advertising techniques do not negate the potential for some beneficial uses of various herbal agents, and they do not necessarily reflect upon the validity of naturopathic medicine as a field of study, critics suggest that they do serve to beguile the public through the employment of nothing more than legally permissible semantics and selective reporting.

Naturopathic modalities may be controversial (e.g. homeopathy), or have proven effectiveness only for very specific conditions (e.g.  acupuncture,  aromatherapy) Some naturopaths may use these modalities as panaceas or to improve the patient's quality of life.

Advocacy

 * Profile of Profession: Naturopathic Practice (312 Kb PDF file) Center for the Health Professions, UCSF


 * Naturopathic physicians:


 * American Association of Naturopathic Physicians
 * Canadian Association of Naturopathic doctors
 * California Naturopathic Doctors Association
 * What is Naturopathic Medicine? by Gary Piscopo, ND, LAc and Eric Yarnell, ND, RH
 * Naturopathyworks - What is Naturopathic Medicine Link to research on naturopathy.


 * Traditional naturopaths:
 * Association of Naturopathic Practitioners
 * Coalition for Natural Health


 * Certifying Organizations:
 * American Naturopathic Certification Board
 * UK General Council and Register of Naturopaths

Criticism

 * Index to Information about Naturopathy — Quackwatch
 * Naturopathy by Robert T. Carroll — The Skeptic's Dictionary
 * The National Council Against Health Fraud
 * Naturopathy: A Critical Analysis by Barry L. Beyerstein, PhD, and Susan Downie

Current events and News

 * Can Naturopathic Remedies Fight Cancer, Hot Flashes? -Forbes.com

Naturopathic educational institutions

 * Australian schools
 * Australian College of Natural Medicine - Brisbane, Queensland and Melbourne, Victoria
 * Southern Cross University - Lismore, New South Wales
 * College of Natural Therapies (ACNT) Sydney
 * Nature Care College, Sydney
 * The University of Western Sydney offers a degree in naturopathy


 * Indian schools, naturopathic and yoga hospitals


 * Government Gandhi Nature Cure College.
 * DM College of Naturopathy.
 * Government Nature Cure Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
 * Institute Of Naturopathy and Yogic Sciences, Bangalore.
 * S.P. Goenka Kayakalp and Research Centre, Near Jaipur, Rajasthan.


 * Ireland schools
 * The College of Naturopathic Medicine Ireland Dublin, Galway, Cork, Limerick


 * North American schools
 * National College of Natural Medicine - Portland, Oregon
 * Bastyr University - Seattle, Washington
 * Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine - Tempe, Arizona
 * Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine - Toronto, Ontario
 * College of Naturopathic Medicine of University of Bridgeport - Bridgeport, Connecticut
 * Boucher Institute of Naturopathic Medicine - New Westminster, British Columbia
 * Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges - Association of the six above schools


 * UK schools
 * College of Osteopaths
 * British College of Osteopathic Medicine
 * The College of Naturopathic Medicine UK London, Bristol, Brighton, Birmingham, Manchester, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Belfast
 * The College of Natural Nutrition