User:Apothecartea/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose gender studies, as this topic is deeply intertwined with the school of feminist and queer thought.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This article begins with a strong lead giving an overview of what the field of gender studies covers. The lead section introduces content like women's and men's studies that is covered later in the article. The article's content includes a variety of different voices on the topic, including widespread research and criticism, as well as related fields of study that have a part in influencing gender studies. Sources are up to date, with one being retrieved as recent as Dec. 2021. References are a wide range of authors, articles, and fields of study. Article is clear and well organized, though the talk page has some critiques on clarity for readers unfamiliar with theory, and that perhaps the article makes too many leaps. Because this is such a wide-reaching topic, it may cover too much ground. This article also has large sections for "Influence" and "Criticisms," but may need more on the topic of modern-day gender study.