User:Apple1223/AirPods/Ajt5737 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Apple1223
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Apple1223/AirPods

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? No
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? n/a

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * Is the content added up-to-date? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * Are the sources current? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * Check a few links. Do they work? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? In general, yes the article itself does.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? I think so yes



Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * What are the strengths of the content added? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything
 * How can the content added be improved? N/A, doesn't look like the user did anything

Overall evaluation
I think this person might've just forgot to do the assignment ):