User:Apple F1/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
2016 Baseball Hall of Fame balloting

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this because I wanted to view some information from the past. Seeing how the difference is between now and to see if it's accurate. This article is talking about the past, I wanted to find a piece from the past to compare it to the present and see whether there had been any changes. However, this piece met my expectations and did not let me down. It wasn't what I expected it to be.

Evaluate the article
This article is particularly useful thanks to the wealth of information it contains, including media photographs, a list of all the players, and details about their careers. Each topic in the article is clearly defined, and each paragraph and debate stays on topic. Everything is supported by an information source, and when you consult the source, the information is furthered by the source. Since this is about 2016, the most of these sources are not current, but that's okay. The article is current, contains information about how things were in the past and how they are now as of 2016, explains each award in detail, and includes numerous notes and references, as well as external links if you want to learn more about a particular subject. It also explains how percentages are calculated for each player and the votes they received, and starts off with a basic total, which makes it very interesting. The top of this piece is my favorite part. There is a little window with basic information, and you can click right or left to advance or slow down the years for comparison.

This article isn't particularly complex. It is quite straightforward and consists only of providing the facts for everyone to see, read, and comprehend. I believe the text is really nicely written because it is straightforward and to the point with no filler. Because this is such a straightforward subject, it is simple to write such a straightforward thing; all you have to do is lay down all the fax making it useful of the space, as well as useful information and not getting distracted. The lead does include an introductory sentence and is very well written; it draws you into the paragraph, keeps you in the paragraph, and lets you go at the end, making it a concise paragraph.

Even when it refers to a location that has been highlighted, you can click on it to be sent there as well as to the names that have been highlighted. If you click on the names, you'll be taken to the page of the individual, and their names contain a few words that you might not understand if you are unfamiliar with the sport. Additionally, it has been highlighted, which makes it much simpler for readers to read even if they are unfamiliar with the sport. As I previously stated, everything is straightforward and provides all the information, and my favorite feature is that you can easily click to move onto the next year. I didn't know anything about this topic but reading it I understand it and not confused when I need the information on the certain players it's all there I don't need to do additional research on any of the information.