User:Applesandbanana/Flower in the Crannied Wall/Momo 318 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Applesandbanana


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Applesandbanana/Flower_in_the_Crannied_Wall?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Flower in the Crannied Wall

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
Applesandbanana adds some new information in this article, but Applesandbanana doesn't update the lead. Moreover, the original article barely has a lead section (there is only one short sentence). Thus, it would be better if Applesandbanana could write a lead section and reflect the whole article.

Content
The content added is neutral. Viewpoints are not overrepresented nor underrepresented.

Sources and References
The reliable secondary source of information backs up the new content, which accurately reflects what the cited sources say. However, I felt confused about the first sentence in the "Analysis" part. I could not see the reference, so I wonder if Tennyson truly intends to compose this poem like this.

Organization
The content added is well-written, and very concise, clear, and easy to read. The content added is well-organized. But I wondered if we could divide the section "Analysis" into different parts: after all, the original author and Applesandbanana talk about multiple things in this section, such as the poet's intention, critics' interpretations, and the poem's influences.

Images and Media
The original article has had some images that enhance understanding of the topic, and they are well-captioned.

Overall impressions
The new content added has improved the overall quality of the article. Applesandbanana reviewed the original one's references, added more information. However, as a reader, I hope to know more, such as the poem's structure and readers' reactions at that time.