User:AprilDiamond18/De-extinction

Lead
De-extinction (also known as resurrection biology, or species revivalism) is the process of generating an organism that either resembles or is an extinct species. There are several ways to carry out the process of de-extinction. Cloning is the most widely proposed method, although genome editing and selective breeding have also been considered. Similar techniques have been applied to certain endangered species, in hopes to boost their genetic diversity. The only method of the three that would provide an animal with the same genetic identity is cloning. There are benefits and drawbacks to the process of de-extinction ranging from technological advancements to ethical issues. Although the idea of de-extinction is a recent phenomenon in scientific history, there are waves in the methods and it is common contributed to aiding in ecological conservation

Back breeding
Back breeding is a form of selective breeding. As opposed to breeding animals for a trait to advance the species in selective breeding, back breeding involves breeding animals for an ancestral characteristic that may not be seen throughout the species as frequently. This method can recreate the traits of an extinct species, but the genome will differ from the original species. Back breeding, however, is contingent on the ancestral trait of the species still being in the population in any frequency. Back breeding is also a form of artificial selection by the deliberate selective breeding of domestic animals, in an attempt to achieve an animal breed with a phenotype that resembles a wild type ancestor, usually one that has gone extinct. Breeding back is not to be confused with dedomestication.

Back breeding as a means of de-extinction was undergone during the interwar period in Germany (1918-1939), for the species called 'aurochs.' '''This species was a European cattle and they had gone extinct in 1627 in Poland. This program was one of the earliest examples of back-breeding and it was an experiment conducted by the Heck Brothers; they intended to mix morphological factors of European cattle at the time and their plan was to have the phenotype of the aurochs be present in this new species.'''

Disadvantages of de-extinction
The reintroduction of extinct species could have a negative impact on extant species and their ecosystem. The extinct species' ecological niche may have been filled in its former habitat, making it an invasive species. This could lead to the extinction of other species due to competition for food or other competitive exclusion. It could lead to the extinction of prey species if they have more predators in an environment that had few predators before the reintroduction of an extinct species. If a species has been extinct for a long period of time the environment they are introduced to could be wildly different from the one that they can survive in. The changes in the environment due to human development could mean that the species may not survive if reintroduced into that ecosystem. A species could also become extinct again after de-extinction if the reasons for its extinction are still a threat. The woolly mammoth might be hunted by poachers just like elephants for their ivory and could go extinct again if this were to happen. Or, if a species is reintroduced into an environment with disease for which it has no immunity, the reintroduced species could be wiped out by a disease that current species can survive.

De-extinction is a very expensive process. Bringing back one species can cost millions of dollars. The money for de-extinction would most likely come from current conservation efforts. These efforts could be weakened if funding is taken from conservation and put into de-extinction. This would mean that critically endangered species would start to go extinct faster because there are no longer resources that are needed to maintain their populations. Also, since cloning techniques cannot perfectly replicate a species as it existed in the wild, the reintroduction of the species may not bring about positive environmental benefits. They may not have the same role in the food chain that they did before and therefore cannot restore damaged ecosystems.

The processes of de-extinction may not benefit once extinct species and scientist resurrecting extinct species, may just be a scientific breakthrough, but may not be advantageous to species alive today or the species that once roamed and dominated various ecosystems. As apex predators, humans have a responsibility to ethically conduct these methods that allow for there to be progress.

'''The wooly rhino (Coelodonta antiquitatis) were prominent species in the P. Tundra and they once roamed the Earth on the continents of Asia and Europe. They were'''