User:Aqp24/Life writing/Lopezj17 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

aqp24


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aqp24/Life_writing?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Life writing

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead- Author indicates that they will be completing the lead after they finalize the rest of their article.

Content- The content being added is relevant and up to date. I think that the content being added helps the reader better understand Life Writing as a whole. Each section seems to be equal.

Tone and Balance- View points are equally represented, and neutral.

Sources and Resources- All of the sources are pretty current and from with in the past 15 years. Everything is backed up by a credible source.

Organization- The article is reorganized in a way that helps the reader better understand the topic. The author does this by getting rid of the background category and replacing it with defining life writing, and then going into historical uses. The content added is concise and clear. There are a couple of spelling errors in the defining life writing section, and an error in the presentation of the self section-"Resultingly".

Images and Media- There are no images or media present, although I do not think it takes away from the article in any way. I do not think images are necessary for this article.

Overall Impressions- Overall, the article is really well put together, and each section is equal. I think after changing the spelling errors and adding the lead this would be a strong article.