User:Ara789/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Gender fluidity)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article to evaluate because this less well-known gender identities are underrepresented on Wikipedia.

My preliminary impression was that the page had very little work done on it - there is very little information. Beyond the definition of gender fluidity given in the first paragraph, the page is more so a collection of facts related to this subject.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section: The article does provide an introductory paragraph about it’s subject- gender fluidity. Maybe something to consider - to my knowledge, the gender identity is be supposed to be gender fluid, rather than gender fluidity - this is more of a concept. The lead does not contain a description of the article’s sections. It could be much more detailed.

Content: The article’s content is only somewhat relevant to the topic. It is more of a collection of facts rather than any critical information. The content is recent though. The article’s outline could be expanded. It only has two sections - history and symbols. This article does deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps and addresses a topic related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Sources and references: There are twelve sources. The links work and they reflect a good mix of secondary academic and news sources that center this topic. Sources specifically about genderfluid individuals rather than this identity as a whole could be added.

Organization and writing quality: Beyond the definition in the introduction, this article mostly contains a few facts related to this identity. Again, there are only two sections - this does not reflect the breadth of this topic. The definition in the introduction could use improvements.

Images and media: The article only contains an image of the genderfluid flag. More photos could be added to enhance understanding of the topic.

Talk page discussion: contains a short conversation about the title of the article - debated changing it to genderfluid. This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies 'and within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality. '

Overall impressions: The article is labeled as a start class. It could be reorganized and expanded.