User:Arahslemc/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Harlem Renaissance
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes, many of the sources come from the 80s and early 2000s
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Much of the background information could be condensed or omitted

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes, as recent as 2017.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is clear and easy to read, but some of the information in the background section could be condensed.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, several
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes. Concise and clear
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? More or less. They're like any other wiki page or encyclopedia

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Talk page is all but empty
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? C-Class level 5 vital article. It's of importance to other WikiProjects but is not listed as one itself.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It doesn't differ much outside of the background having a little too much info.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? C-Class Top importance
 * What are the article's strengths? providing concise and contextually-relevant quotes as supporting evidence in an unbiased manner
 * How can the article be improved? It could mention more female contributors and what the movement meant to and did for black women.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Very well developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: