User:Arahslemc/sandbox

Special:Prefixindex/User:Arahslemc

Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Name of article: (link)

Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.

Lead

Guiding questions

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Lead evaluation Content Guiding questions Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes Is the content up-to-date? Yes, many of the sources come from the 80s and early 2000s Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Much of the background information could be condensed or omitted Content evaluation

meebee just meebe

we should stay 2gether 4ever

Tone and Balance Guiding questions Is the article neutral? Yes Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No Tone and balance evaluation Sources and References Guiding questions Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes Are the sources current? Yes, as recent as 2017. Check a few links. Do they work? Yes Sources and references evaluation Organization Guiding questions Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? It is clear and easy to read, but some of the information in the background section could be condensed. Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes Organization evaluation Images and Media Guiding questions Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, several Are images well-captioned? Yes. Concise and clear Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? More or less. They're like any other wiki page or encyclopedia Images and media evaluation Checking the talk page Guiding questions What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Talk page is all but empty How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? C-Class level 5 vital article. It's of importance to other WikiProjects but is not listed as one itself. How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It doesn't differ much outside of the background having a little too much info. Talk page evaluation Overall impressions Guiding questions What is the article's overall status? C-Class Top importance What are the article's strengths? providing concise and contextually-relevant quotes as supporting evidence in an unbiased manner How can the article be improved? It could mention more female contributors and what the movement meant to and did for black women. How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Very well developed. Overall evaluation Optional activity Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — Arahslemc (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Link to feedback: