User:Arblanks/Postpartum depression/Gadishu Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Angelica Ramirez Blanks (Arblanks)
 * User:Arblanks/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is very concise and easy to understand

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Not at all
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? It does not, it merely provides information

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? They do

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, very concise and easy to understand. I feel very informed just from reading only information of Angelica's contributions
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I did not see any
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, very well organized

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, she presented new and relevant information
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Very informative, listed in a manner in which anyone can understand with ample links for even more understanding and further research on the topic
 * How can the content added be improved? I can't think of any improvements so far, editor is doing very good work. Add more!