User:Ard1228/Peter Pan syndrome/Melanie.riveracolón Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Ard1228
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Ard1228/Peter Pan syndrome

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
''If the lead is the first paragraph of the draft, then it is a great way to start the article. The information added goes directly to the point, it briefly describes the whole article and it is clear. I compared it to the original Wikipedia article and the information on this draft is completely new.''

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
The content added on the draft is relevant to the topic and is good information that should be on the original article.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
''The content added on the article is neutral and informative, not persuasive. Since it is not persuasive, the content on this draft is not biased towards a particular position.''

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
''I clicked on a few sources, they are current and they worked. When I was checking those sources, I noticed that the student "copy- pasted" information. I know that since it is a draft, the student can copy the information that interested the student the most, understand and interpret it in another words (not paraphrasing or any type of plagiarism). That being said, since the student still have time to improve the article, I am looking forward to reading this new information written in his/ her own words.''

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
''The draft is well written and I did not notice any spelling or gramatical errors. Nevertheless, I do think that the article is a little disorganized. I do not know which parts of the draft are from the lead paragraph or if it is part of the sections of the article (content). I recommend the student to divide it into sections, for example:''

Lead
Content.

History of the Peter Pan Syndrome
Content.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
''The student's draft does not have pictures added. However, I know there's time left!''

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
''The article is interesting, informative and well written! I do recommend the student to divide the article in sections so we the readers could know which is the lead paragraph and the other parts of the article. Most importantly, I check some links and the student has put on the draft the same content of those sources. That being said, the student should read it, understand it and interprate it to write it in his/her words. There's time till the due date, so the student has the opportunity to improve it. Other than that, the student is doing a great job providing us a complete article with new information and important information.''

To the student: Good job, keep going!