User:AreHc/Robert Grosseteste/K8shep Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

AreHc


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AreHc/Robert Grosseteste


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Robert Grosseteste

Evaluate the drafted changes
You have added a few sentences, it looks like. But you haven't really called out what you did add, so it's a bit hard to tell. So in general, I'll say that you should make sure to get another source or two. Cite your additions--cite every sentence--especially in the Reputation and Legacy section. That one is good, by the way.

You wanted to add more on John Evelyn's list of scholars. Have you found anything? What do you want to add?

You had mentioned you were struggling to find sources. Has that gotten better? Keep going!

Response to Peer Review
In the future I will make sure it is clear what additions I have made. I will also make sure to re-cite my information. For my sources I have not really found what I was looking for yet but I will keep searching. I will look in the source that I currently have because the book also cites some useful information that could help me expand my work. I am trying to focus more on his life, personality and legacy more than his sciences so I plan on to find sources that help with that. I think that the John Evelyn's list of scholars will help me add to his legacy, my book mentions that he was added to that list but it was only mentioned once so I want to find more to back it up.