User:Ari. gg02/Economic entomology/Mintgreen01 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ari. gg02


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ari.%20gg02/Economic_entomology?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Economic entomology
 * Economic entomology

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead for the article is clear and concise, and reflects the topic.

Content

The content added is relevant to the topic at hand and the sources used are all up to date or very recent. The content is also concise and easy to read.

Tone and Balance

No bias present in the draft and tone appears to be neutral.

Sources and References

Some sentences are either missing sources or it is not specified/clear whether the same source was used twice to cite.

Sentences with no/unclear citations:

"Insects regarded as nuisance pests do not pose as much economic damage as those present in medical and veterinary entomology. Some nuisance insects include silverfish (Zygentoma), cockroaches (Blattodea), many fly species (Diptera), and many ectoparasitic species including fleas (Siphonaptera), bed bugs (Hemiptera), among others. Although these pests do not inflict as much damage to the economy, the Emerald Ash borer (Coleoptera) and the Codling moth (Lepidoptera) do."

"This process causes Mare Reproductive Loss Syndrome . This illness facilitated by insects can induce abortions and has caused up to 300-500 million dollars of loss in Kentucky from 2001-2002."

- In my opinion, the source for this should be added at the end of the second sentence to make it clearer.

Organization / Overall Impressions

Overall, the draft is well-written and easy to grasp. The sections are well split up and organized in a way that is cohesive and well-structured. There are no grammatical errors. The article appears to be more complete, however some more detail in certain aspects can be beneficial.

For example:

"The insects can also damage crops and garden plants."

- How??

Some suggestions I have are to maybe talk about what is being done to prevent insects from causing harm, especially when it comes to the ones that affect the economy. Also, making sure everything is cited correctly.