User:Ariana.reyes.wiki/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) WikiProject Languages
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. It seems interesting and honestly I am still very new to this and could not find another article relating to my class.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes this article gives an introductory sentence to the topic.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes it does so for all articles major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? I don't believe so.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? I think the Lead is concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes, it was lated edited in February 2020.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I think their is content missing.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes all lanugages have links
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? I do not think it is easy to read.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not that I have noticed.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? I do not think it is well organized.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? no
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? A few conversations are going on. Not any on how to represent the topic.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? This is from wiki projects. I do not know how to see how it is rated.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? This is not something we've talked about in class. I had trouble finding an article related to class.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? Not sure what is meant by overall status...I would say it is not complete?
 * What are the article's strengths? It has a good introductory paragraph.
 * How can the article be improved? It can be more organized.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? I think it is not completely developed due to the fact that it does not have every language yet.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: