User:Arianacoletta/User:Imadoor98/sandbox1/Chimmy101395 Peer Review

Peer review by Jaylin

 * 1) Overall the article is pretty good, but it needs a few improvements to make it better. The toner the article is neutral and unbiased.
 * 2) The content in the article was informative, but it lacks some information. The history should include who founded the organization, who are the board members, and basically any history that is relevant to how the organization came about. Something that is missing would be the “veterinary services” because it was mentioned once in the lead, but it wasn’t mentioned again. It would be good to have that section included because it would explain more about what type of services the organization does as examples. It could also be informative to include the volunteer and events that the organization has to give the readers a better understanding of what else they also do. The lead sounds more like a summary than a preview. You should elaborate on it. I also think that the article format should be more of a paragraph format rather than only bullet pointed information.
 * 3) Something that I can apply to our article is the tone. Our article has a few phrased that could be categorized as biased, so this article gave me a good understanding of how not to make it biased. Your information is really informative and it really well written. You guys did a good job. ~