User:Arianamarievasquez/Psychosis/Whitneyatwelle Peer Review

General info
Ariana Vasquez
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Psychosis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Psychosis

Evaluate the drafted changes
I was unable to find your added edits to the article, so I am just going to evaluate the article itself and provide possible ideas for edits. The lead included an introduction sentence that explained the definition of the topic and had a brief description about the criteria of the topic. The lead also included information about all of the article's major sections and was very concise, so I do not think there is anything that needs to be added. Overall, all of the content in the major sections were relevant to the topic and up to date. The only content that was missing was information regarding prevalence in specific populations. I think it would be a good idea to add information about the prevalence of underrepresented populations. Wikipedia also added a few notes about certain parts being too technical for most readers to understand, so you might want to try to simplify those parts. Lastly, you could also add a little bit more information to the research portion since it is a little outdated and there is more than likely newer research that has come out that may be important to add. Overall, all of the content was neutral and properly cited with references. It was also well organized and had very clear, concise sections.