User:Ariellarose19/Delirium/Aksgpp3131 Peer Review

General info
Ariellarose19
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Delirium
 * Delirium

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The content added is relevant and seems current, especially the mention of specific programs like the Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP). The added section discusses socioeconomic factors and their impact on delirium prevention. However, it may be beneficial to include additional information on global perspectives on prevention strategies and different cultural differences in care.

The general tone of the content is both neutral and informative. Also, the content does not have any bias information or use any persuasive language but maybe could benefit from diverse viewpoints. The content is also supported by reliable sources and properly cited.

Overall, the entire section is well-written and easy to understand. There are no issues with grammar and spelling. The section adds valuable information to the article and is well-organized.