User:Ariellarose19/Delirium/Csteel3777 Peer Review

General info
Ariellarose19
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ariellarose19/Delirium?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Delirium:

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Yes, Ari added information about an example of a program that demonstrates delirium prevention, therefore it is relevant to the rest of the article and particularly this section which discusses prevention. I believe this content is up-to-date as it is a continuing program. This topic is addressing mainly elderly populations who are more likely to experience delirium.

The content added is presented from a neutral perspective and doesn't appear to be biased as it is presenting facts about an organization. The content doesn't try to persuade the reader, but rather talks about this prevention program and how volunteers are utilized to assist elderly patients experiencing delirium.

The information included was sited within references and accurately reflects what this source is saying. This source is thorough, especially given it provides so much information about this one program. The source was published in 2018, therefore it is current information regarding the program and its work. There are roughly five authors who were sited, therefore there was a wide variety of authors assisting in writing this systematic review. The link provided isn't correctly hyperlinked so it isn't as easy to access the article.

Yes, the content added is very well written and provides an interesting, yet not too overpowering, glimpse into what the program is doing. It is well organized and free of any grammatical errors.