User:Ariellarose19/Elderly care/Csteel3777 Peer Review

General info
Ariellarose19
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ariellarose19/Elderly_care?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Elderly care

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The content that was added revolved around ageism and delirium which is very relevant to the article which was discussing elderly care. The added content is up to date and presents a description of what ageism and delirium are. I think that Ari could dive even further into talking about delirium and how it is relevant when discussing elder care if the article has any more information. The article is addressing concerns of ageism which could be viewed as an equity gap.

The content that is added is primarily definitions, therefore it is a neutral source of information. None of the added information appears to be heavily biased towards a particular position and it isn't attempting to persuade the reader, but rather stating what these two definitions are and how they are present when discussing elderly care.

The new content added was sourced from a reliable article about social inequalities in care. This article is rather new, being published in 2019, therefore all of the information is relevant and accurately presented. Though this article does a great job at laying the foundation for what ageism and delirium are, I am sure there are many other articles out there that could build upon this. That being said, I enjoyed the incorporation of this article because I liked the approach it took in addressing social inequities within the healthcare system as a whole. This link isn't correctly hyperlinked, but it still directs you to the correct article.

The added content is concise and presented in a manner that is easy to read and interesting. There are no grammatical errors and I think that the added information adds to this part of the article as a whole.