User:Arika.solarez21/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1
Antibody-drug conjugate



'''The content of the article remains relevant while giving concise information regarding the history and research of the topic. The article is written neutrally and each claim provides the reader with a citation. Most of the article's sources appear to be reliable and upon further inquiry of each source, there seems to be apparent information that upholds facts. Clicking on a good amount of the sources to develop a better understanding of their credibility, I found that there were peer-reviewed journal articles, links to studies done related to the topic along with additional general articles that are not necessarily peer-reviewed but remain accredited. When clicking on the Talk page, this summary is deemed as a C-Class article in quality. With room for improvement, I think this is a qualifying article to evaluate with additional input from other editors of the page.'''

'''Collaborative list of 35 sources. Most sources are fairly recent and up to date, in the last ten years.'''



Option 2

 * List of plants with dehiscent fruits
 * The article's content does remain relevant to the topic, and although this article provides an easy to read outline regarding the information obtained in the article, it does not extend information to equip the reader with full details. Main areas of improvement I noticed for the article was the lack of a References section along with the inability to provide subheadings to include organized sections of the article. The article does remain neutral in tone. I noticed that the main purpose of this article was to provide a list regarding the topic, however I think it has potential to involve a body of information in relation to the topic. Further research could provide the reader with facts and claims surrounding this topic.
 * No evident sources provided, this is an area on improvement.
 * No evident sources provided, this is an area on improvement.
 * No evident sources provided, this is an area on improvement.

Option 3
Human-to-primate transmission


 * The article's content is relevant to the topic, while mostly discussing human transmission of diseases to monkeys. There is a neutral tone to the article, it provides factual resonance and each claim provides a citation and link to click on. The citations in the references page are peer-reviewed journal articles related to the topic. Although this article is well-written and endowed with reliable sources, I think the writing is very short and provides only a sentence for each citation. I feel as though each idea and claim should be further explored, as the article is very quick to the point. I believe the topic could be elaborated on and provided with more details and information on the topic. Taking a look at the Talk page of the article, it is classified as a Start-Class article. With relevant and reliable sources along with a well-written, original article, there is potential to provide the reader with informative details on the subject matter.
 * https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v69i2.819 "Detection of antibodies to selected human pathogens among wild and pet macaques (Macaca tonkeana) in Sulawesi, Indonesia" https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2006.75.716 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2014.12.001 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01496-16 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19554-0 "Tuberculosis (TB) outbreak in a closed Aotus monkey breeding colony: Epidemiology, diagnosis and TB screening using antibody and interferon-gamma release testing"
 * https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v69i2.819 "Detection of antibodies to selected human pathogens among wild and pet macaques (Macaca tonkeana) in Sulawesi, Indonesia" https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2006.75.716 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2014.12.001 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01496-16 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19554-0 "Tuberculosis (TB) outbreak in a closed Aotus monkey breeding colony: Epidemiology, diagnosis and TB screening using antibody and interferon-gamma release testing"

Option 4

 * Plandemic
 * I feel as though this is a particularly difficult article to tackle in terms of improvement however, there are many aspects of the article to be evaluated in terms of if it is factual or reliable. First off, the article does stay relevant to the content however, most of the claims made in the article could be provided with a rebuttal and at points in the reading, there are a plethora of falsified claims regarding the topic. Most of the claims made in the article are accompanied with a citation, although it could be argued that each claim is insufficiently affiliated with a reliable source of information. The overall tone and writing style of the article seems to be underperformed and heavily bias in terms of a write-up in Wikipedia with a purpose to provide reliable information. It is clumsily written and many of the claims could be considered pseudoscience while also being debunked. This is an area of improvement to consider when evaluating the article. Seeing as though this article received a lot of backlash in the Talk section regarding the claims made throughout the article, I would say that evaluation this article deems on the side of generous improvement.
 * This article provides the reader with a total of 52 sources in the References section.
 * This article provides the reader with a total of 52 sources in the References section.
 * This article provides the reader with a total of 52 sources in the References section.