User:ArjunChikkappa/Norse colonization of North America/Jaelienrivera Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

ArjunChikkappa


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:ArjunChikkappa/Norse colonization of North America


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Norse colonization of North America

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is well-developed and gives the reader a good idea of what the article topic is about. He removed some info from the original article that was redundant and would not have been good use for the reader and added some info to end off the lead article and provide some info to how this topic ties back to be a hoax.

All of the content included in the page is relevant to the article and allows the reader to grasp a better understanding of the history behind the Norse Colonization of North America as well as the pseudo-history. There is a lot of information that follows this article's topic and I feel as though that he does a good job including information that is relevant to the topic and information that clarifies parts of the article that may be unclear at first. The article is very neutral and well-developed.

There are multiple sources used in this article and in-line citations are used. There are plenty of images with captions, which gives the reader a better understanding of topics discussed throughout the article.

Overall, this article is extremely well-developed and includes lots of valuable and relevant information with very few-to no typos/ errors. The lead is very engaging and informs the readers why this topic is an archaeological hoax. There are links within each section to help with clarification and the content is very diverse.