User:Armann Kahlon

About me!
The 18-year-old student from Seattle Washington! While I like to try new things all the time some of my main hobbies include photography, Gym, PC building/Market knowledge (Reading about new groundbreaking products being released every day), Coding, and hockey. Of course, being from Seattle I'm a Kraken fan! Did you know? They chose the name Kraken to find the theme of Seattle and its relation with water with fishing and sailing. From my hobbies you can tell that I'm looking for a career in computer science and while I don't know what sector I would like to go into I'm hoping that I'll learn that as I take classes and attend CS-related events.

While on Wikipedia I plan to research a different topic at least once a week. Whether it be history, science or science history. On topics I know a lot about I hope to contribute to pages by updating information or adding extra categories or information.

Article evaluation
It's lack of Citations

There are a lot of citations on the page, but still lacks enough to become a verified Wikipedia article. "verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source". This article failed to use one of the biggest performance indexs the official intel one, This would tell you the latency decrease, performance increase and cost difference. It'll tell you the massive technology upgrades such as the legacy and integrated raid architectures.

Lack of explanation to people who might not know much about specs.

One thing I've noticed is that in the Wikipedia a lot of the information is something people with advanced computer knowledge would have to know. While the references explained it in a way that anyone with very basic computer knowledge (like me) could understand.

Only listing CPUs

A very important thing when talking about CPU's is with what system they would work with. CPUs are the brain of the computer but some CPUs won't work with some motherboards because of form factors. Anyone looking for information about CPU's also would want to know something as important as what form factors they'll work with. This was a huge red flag when going through this Wikipedia page.

Conclusion

Overall the article I'd say is pretty good. It included a lot of information and put it in tables to make it easy to read with their statistics. There's not enough resources to get Wikipedia verified or doesn't use the intel indexes so the reliability is questionable.