User:Armiejane/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Science communication)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(I choose to evaluate this article because it is very much related to the topic of the course. It provides important sources of information of what science communication is and that it is mainstream.)

Evaluate the article
(The topic of the article clearly describes the content of the article. The article firstly introduced that science communication is an inward-facing and outward-facing outreach, which considers the mainstream platforms of science communication. The content of the article were organized in sub-topics, which made it organized and no overlapping of information. Additionally, the information provided were neutral because there were no personal views or comments. Moreover, the images that were included corresponds with each of the sub-topics in the content of the article. The resources that have also been used in the article were cited from academically written articles.

Although the article was written very informedly, there were a few sections in the article, specifically about " Science communication in contemporary media," in which the accompanying sub-topics that introduced examples of science communication, it didn't include images. Images would've been helpful to include in order for the public/viewers to see how these events take place in these different platforms. Although the accompanying sub-topics under that section ("Science communication in contemporary media") was written in a way that can easily be understood, images would've helped to emphasize it more." Armiejane (talk) 19:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC)