User:Arnavv2/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Biotechnology risk

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
This article was listed as a C-class biology article, meaning there are areas that need improvement. This article, specifically the CRISPR editing section, is relevant to this class.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article lead section is missing mention of certain subsections. It includes information that is not present in the article.

Equity gaps are not addressed in the article content. The content is relevant to the topic. The article could use information on sociological risks.

In terms of tone and balance, the article could use different points of view. The sources seem to sway the reader into a negative view. There is slight bias.

The writing is sensible. One sentence from the lead opener can be moved to a subsection. No images are present.

The article is underdeveloped.