User:Arpierc1/Quantum mysticism/Led201133 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Arpierc1's Quantim Mysticism article/bibliography


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Arpierc1/Quantum mysticism


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Quantum mysticism

Lead

 * No, the lead has not been updated to reflect new content added.
 * However, Arpierc1's sandbox contribution considerations does refer to the lead of the article and concisely what they plan to do for the article.
 * Yes, the suggested contribution sections are briefly described.
 * Yes, a huge chunk of information is not already present in the article such as Quantum Mysticism and its presence in Abrahamic and Indian religions.
 * The lead is concise.

Content

 * All content to be added is relevant to the topic.
 * All content considered is recent.
 * All content suggested does seem to belong to the article and no content seems to be missing.
 * I don't believe this article deals with Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance

 * Yes, Arpierc1's suggestions are neutral and do not draw in favor of some viewpoint.
 * No, I don't believe any claims made are heavily biased.
 * No, while covering Quantum Mysticism and religions, Arpierc1 gave all of their covered religious viewpoints equal representation.
 * No, the suggested content does not persuade me in favor of any position.

Sources and References

 * All new suggested content are backed by sources in-depth with Arpierc1 explaining the contents of all secondary sources. There are also quotes from the sources which gives an even bigger idea of where this information is being drawn from.
 * Yes, the suggested content does not drift from what the sources state. Arpierc1 consistently quoted their references and the sections they wrote about reflect the views considering Quantum Mysticism and the religions they chose.
 * I believe all sources are thorough, Mysticism in Indian Philosophy is the shortest reference and even that is extremely thorough for content to add to the article.
 * Not all sources are current, with Mysticism in Indian Philosophy being the most dated, but I believe a majority of the information included is still relevant for the article.
 * All sources are written by authors from diverse backgrounds, with no two sources sharing the same author.
 * The references that do have links work.

Organization

 * Suggested content is concise, clear, and easy to read in my opinion. The topic seems complex in general so it's a little difficult to explain in layman terms for every person to understand.
 * I did not catch any grammatical or spelling issues in the sandbox.
 * The sandbox is extremely well-organized with good use of headers to split up the content they wish to bring over from the sandbox to the article.

Overall Impressions
The original article had content about old world and new age Quantum Mysticism, but it did not go in-depth between the religious and scientific aspects of Quantum Mysticism. With the additions you're planning, I believe the article is more complete. All of your suggested content don't feel thrown together and all connect pretty well regarding the topic. If possible, I was wondering how Confucianism and Taoism would be seen under the light of Quantum Mysticism. Just like Buddhism, they're not entirely centered around gods and are focused on philosophical teachings.