User:Arstb14/Raffinose/Wafflemaker02 Peer Review

General info
(Arstb14)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Arstb14/Raffinose
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Raffinose

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The author did not make any edits to the lead so it has not been updated to include new content about plant health and uses of raffinose. The author should include a brief description of the article's major section to give the readers a summary of the article. However, the lead does have a good leading sentence that is able to introduce the topic of the readers. The overall lead was well written and concise, however it included information about the raffinose enzyme not cleaving β-linked galactose, which is information not included in the rest of the wikipedia article. Therefore, the author should consider removing that part.

Content: The added content is relevant to the topic and all the references added was only 2 or 3 years ago, making all the added information up to date. It mainly includes factual statements of the topic, and therefore does not address topics that are related to the historically underrepresented populations.

Tone and balance: The content added has a neutral also it is mainly stating facts about the topic and does not seem to appear biased towards a particular position.

Source: All sources come from reliable secondary sources and are relatively new (mainly from 2022). The content also accurately reflects what the cited source says and does not seem to twist the information presented in the source. The sources are also written by a diverse spectrum of authors and all of the links work as well. However, the author can add a few more sources, as there does not seem to be any sources that back up the claims made in the first two paragraphs from the plant health section.

Organization: The sections are well organized in a sensible order. The author placed the added content about plant health under the subsection about the biochemical properties, which correlates well with the subject. It is also under the section about chemical properties, which allows readers to have a basic understanding of the chemistry of the compound first before delving into the application part of the topic. The content contains some minor spelling errors and grammatical mistakes, but it should be easily fixed with some proofreadings.

Images and media: The author did not add any new images. If possible, the author can include images of Galactinol synthase to further engage the readers and enhance their understanding of the topic.

Overall impression: The content added has improved the over quality of the article and made it more complete. The added information, especially the section about plant health, is applicable and adds to the the interest of the readers. However, the article can benefit from including more images to further capture the readers attention. The author should also update the lead to include the added information. Overall a really good job in improving the quality of the wikipedia article.