User:ArtHistorianStudent/Interior of a Gothic Church by Paul Vredeman de Vries/Lightcorot777 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead reflects new, unmentioned content that is relevant to the page. Adding an intro sentence describing the paragraph as Vries' background will limit confusion. Including more details about the piece will also help with comprehension. The content seems to be up-to-date and accurate. The content was easy to understand and concise. If you could find a better link to the third source, it would make your bibliography more accessible.

I would check some of the grammar to ensure it reflects a past tense with neutral stances. For example, maybe going into a bit more detail into how and why Prague was not a city that was recognized for its art and tying that back into how Vries helped the spread of art. Also, you may want to consider adding a transition between the sentence about the large-scale buildings and the Emperor moving to Prague.

Overall, this seems to be a concise article that has been well-researched. This is a very good start and I'm excited to see where this article leads!