User:Artaxiad/RA

Urartu article dispute
Hi Nareklm. User:Dacy69 has made a request for assistance in the editing of the Urartu article. According to Dacy69, the dispute centres on differing views on the ethnic composition of Urartu. You are not named in the dispute; however, I note that you have been involved in recent editing of the article, so I would be interested in getting your views.

Dacy69's request is for "neutral wording of section "Ethnic Composition" of page Urartu". From my reading of the situation, it appears that Dacy69 would like information about the Hurrit tribe to be included in the article. It also appears that he has provided evidence that some scholars believe the Hurrit tribe did live in Urartu. Is the evidence he provides correct? If the evidence is correct, and some scholars are saying that the Hurrit tribe did live in Urartu, then what is your opinion on that information appearing in the article? SilkTork 11:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Happy new year by the way! Baristarim 09:39, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Tigranes II
Hi, thanks for adding references to the Tigranes II article. Wouldn't it be preferable if you showed exactly which part of the text corresponds to which reference, especially if you cite the pages? When I add content, that's how I proceed. Either way, I don't mind. Oh, and Happy New Year! -- Davo88 07:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Paytakaran
Hi and happy New year. NO, I don't think there should be two separate articles, as it was the same regions, which changed hands from time to time. Regards, Grandmaster 08:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello
I have read some of the new articles you created. I have to tell you, they have made me somewhat frustrated as often the English is not good and there many problems with how the facts are organized. However, the subjects you have chosen to give attention to are good ones and I understand why you would want to see them included on Wikiepdia. I will try to clean up your articles as best I can but it will take time. You can see what I have done with Haghpat Monestary. If you look at Trdat the Architect you will see much material was removed -- that is because you didn't tell us how it related to the architect. My first priority will always to make an article grammatically correct and able to be understood. Inclusion of more facts comes second. So, for example, I want to expand Trdat the Architect but many of your new articles about Armenian topics require more immediate attention. I will help as much as I can. I hope this message makes good sense to you and I wish you a happy 2007. House of Scandal 09:47, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Licenses at Flickr
Flickr allows users to choose one of five licensing arrangements. We can only use those licensed CC-BY and CC-BY-SA. The one you are interested in is licensed CC-NC-ND, which means "noncommercial use" and "no derivatives", so we cannot use it. You could use the Flickr messaging system to ask the person to consider changing the license to CC-BY (attribution) or CC-BY-SA (attribution, sharealike). Jkelly 19:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested
Khoikhoi 20:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Protection
Christopher Columbus was protected by admin Can't sleep, clown will eat me, and I protected Armenian Genocide. Thanks, Nareklm. =)  Nish kid 64  21:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Military history of Armenia
Do you have any picture suggestions for Military history of Armenia? I've added plenty of text, but didn't find good images. Thanks. --Davo88 02:11, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Maps are ok, but yeah, I was looking for military pics. You think pictures from PC strategy games would be ok? --Davo88 02:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * IN your user page, you seem to have a better translated version of what Pope Gregory said about the Armenians. I had the quote in an Armenian history book, and had a hard time translating it to use it in the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia article. May I use yours?--Davo88 05:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It's really good, thanks, I'll add it to the Military history of Armenia article... or did I accidentally delete it somewhere? -- Davo88 21:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

I found a good source
Encyclopedia Americana, v. 2, USA 1980, pgs. 539, 541

Mentions Urartu (Armenia), and also about the writing of cuneiform, it says is ancient Armenian writing.

Narek I found some more info about Hovick Nersessian.

Hovick Nersessian, "Highlands of Armenia," Los Angeles, 2000.

Mr. Nersessian is in the New York Academy of Sciences.

Haghpat Monastery
Haghpat Monastery is a DYK main page right now.  ◄ HouseOfScandal  ►  20:53, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Did you know
Hi, I'm sorry but where is did you know? Chaldean 00:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Dont I have to wait until August for this? Chaldean 01:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually, I am still working on it. I'm gonna need more time to finish it. Is it ok if we wait? Chaldean 01:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok thanks, go ahead. Chaldean 01:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Narek, this article was actually made three months ago. There hasn't been enough substantial expansion to qualify it for DYK again, though. Maybe if the article creator expanded significantly, it could get on DYK. Also, watch for the wording there. "Annhilated" is a definite sensitive word, and would probably not sit well with Iraqi editors.  Nish kid 64  01:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * See . This is a diff from the 19th, and from the looks of it, this article has not been expanded much at all in recent days. By the way, the same 5-day rule applies for expansion, as it does with creation.  Nish kid 64  01:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Nareklm, I thank you for your support. I did a neutral report about the event; []. Maybe this will help us expand it. Chaldean 02:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Nareklm, again thanks for your help, I saw your nomination. Chaldean 05:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Baklava
Well, I guess you could add a sentence that says, "according to other sources, such as (...), it is of Greek origin". Then you can cite the source. Khoikhoi 10:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

3RR
Hey, to quote from WP:3RR:

The 3RR is generally not enforced against editors reverting changes to user page space accorded them (this includes associated talk pages and subpages), on the principle that although you do not own it, your user space is "yours" (for project-related purposes).

Some people consider it bad form to remove comments (other than personal attacks) from your Talk page except to archive them. Other people with very busy talk pages (such as Jimbo Wales) remove every comment once it is read. Such comments stay in page history.

When in doubt, currently it is unfortunately unwise to revert. Wikilawyering over reversions in your user area have been interpreted as disruption on either side.

Khoikhoi 01:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, it's saying some people "consider it bad form". I think I know who you're talking about (lol), and if someone is flooding your talkpage, the best thing to do is report it at WP:AN/I. Users such as Essjay for example archive their talk page frequently, and I personally see nothing wrong with it. Interestingly enough, there's a current discussion at Administrators' noticeboard that you might want to check out. Cheers, Khoikhoi 01:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Helpme

 * Hi, you may like to take a look at the steps outlined at Resolving disputes, or you may want to report the user to the Administrator's Noticeboard for Incidents, where a lot of users will be able to provide help and support. Good luck! Cheers, Tangotango (talk) 07:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Archiving
Well, I don't know if it's working yet, but see User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Template. That should tell you if you're doing everything right. If you can't figure it out there, then just copy, paste and tweak around the coding from someone else's talk page.  Nish kid 64  14:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Looks like it. See User:Nareklm/RA. Or you could set it to archive every day, then wait a day. Xiner (talk, email) 02:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Not sure on the code is the code right im just curious :) thanks. Nareklm 02:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Not sure what you're not sure about, but wait 24 hours and you'll find out. Xiner (talk, email) 02:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Request for Mediation
This message delivered: 04:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC).

Removing sourced information from Kashmiri people
Please do not delete sourced information from articles, as you did with Kashmiri people. This is considered vandalism. Specifically, you removed the mention that the Ahmadiyya groups also support the "Lost Tribe" identification for Kashmiri people. The Behnam 00:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Have you tried reading the Ahmadiyya source? The reference specifically mentions Kashmiri people as from Lost Tribes of Israel. I have no clue why you remove the Ahmaddiya opinion. I can even provide a reference to actual Qu'ranic commentary by Maulana Mohammad Ali, though it is not necessary because of the source I provided. So yes, you are vandalizing the page. The Behnam 00:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Your accusations are ridiculous if someone reverts a edit it is not vandalism anyone can do that it happens alot i can revert it to fit my needs wikipedia is not for you its for everyone. Nareklm 01:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * To The Behnam: It seems awfully POV. Not all references are trusted, and even if you find POV statements that are sourced, they shouldn't be included into the article.  Nish kid 64  01:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I just came upon the article once, and it blatantly stated the Rabbi's view as fact. I NPOV-ed it, and added the Ahmadiyya remark because they hold a similar view. I don't know anything about Kashmiri people aside from these fringe theories, but that reference was from the Ahmadiyya website. While I want someone to add real facts about modern Kashmiri people, no one has done that. I am not sure why Nareklm only removes the Islamic reference; it isn't too different from the Rabbi reference. In any case, it is sourced information, and the view of a significant Islamic movement, so it shouldn't be removed. If you felt the presentation was POV, just make it not POV, but don't remove the information. The Behnam 01:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for not removing the Ahmadiyya reference again. Also, thanks for titling the references. Hopefully, some people will come around to have the article cover more than just fringe views. Thanks again for the good work. The Behnam 01:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Simele massacre
Thank you so much! Wow, I didnt know it could have happened. Again, thank you very much. Chaldean 13:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Removing sourced information from an article
Please do not delete sourced information from an article, as you did by reverting Azerbaijan. This is considered vandalism. The Behnam 00:24, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Please do not tell me this your edits were POV and very inaccurate please refrain from your edits. Nareklm 00:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't know what POV you are accusing me of, but no POV is behind my edits. You also do not explain the supposed inaccuracy of my edit. I mentioned that Atropates is a Persian nobleman, and sourced this description. Your revert removed this sourced information, and thus you deserved a warning. If your objection was to my description of the article about the newspaper as an "analysis", this could simply be changed to an "article" about the political newspaper. Also, your revert removed various improvements I made to links, etc. Please refrain from such vandalism, thank you. The Behnam 00:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * If you knew your edits were so accurate why were people reverting it? next time please use the talk page. Nareklm 00:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Azerbaijani reverted an entire series of edits because of one mistake, which I amended in my revert of his revert. You then simply reverted, no reason given. I will bring them up on the talk page. Apparently you aren't planning to explain what was so inaccurate about the last version I made, but you still removed sourced information. Now you are defending vandalism! That's really something. The Behnam 00:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * That is not vandalism first of all, and you were next time please do it. Nareklm 01:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

I have now brought up Atropates on the article talk page, so if you have the time, could you go and explain what was wrong with the Persian edit? The Behnam 16:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Zakarid Armenia
I didn't revert the recent edits by anon because I don't know anything about its history. But you might want to check them out. Baristarim 14:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The edits are correct. The Zakarids had a very high title in the Georgian court (Mkhardzeli) which meant long handed. The Zakarid Armenian principality was under the protection of the Kingdom of Georgia. --  Ευπάτωρ   Talk!! 14:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Do me a favor, dont talk to Artur
I was right the first time. I knew this guy was wrong. The guy is speaking of the 500 BC claims of Armenian. What kind of haya ged is this guy? You kidding me? This guy is agreeing basically with Turks claims of Armenian history from 500 BC. Ararat arev 14:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah cause he proved you wrong? Pathetic. Nareklm 20:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Narek inch es khosoom? Arachee herteen chee gardazeh. Yergrord proved inch vor menk 500 BC enk??? Inch es asoom? You even know better then him. Ararat arev 20:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Ararat arev
He has been reverting back and forth, but I will only warn him for 3RR now. It seems like a content dispute, which means you could potentially be blocked for 3RR violations as well. I have left him a 3RR warning on his user talk page.  Nish kid 64  23:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I mean if you revert his edit again (for a 3rd time). If this happens, then I will have to block both of you for 3RR, and I don't think you would want this. Continue discussing with the user, please.  Nish kid 64  23:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Technically, no. I warned you not to do 3RR, so if you do it, then I will have to block you. Try getting others involved in the discussion on the article talk page. People may revert in support of your claim, and then you won't need to violate 3RR.  Nish kid 64  23:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm saying you can't revert 3 times because I have already warned you not to. So, basically one more revert to an article will result in a 24-hour block.  Nish kid 64  00:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Usually, someone will see a person with 3 reverts, and then warn them. The 4th revert would be a 24-hour 3RR block. However, I have already informed you about this, so going for the 3rd revert is blockable here.  Nish kid 64  00:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It's a case where I can go ignore all rules, because I have already warned you for a possible 3R(R). If you hadn't told me, and I had seen a three reverts, I would have warned you and blocked you if you had done a 4th revert.  Nish kid 64  00:28, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe I missed it, but where exactly was he formally warned for 3RR violations?  Nish kid 64  00:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm...well I guess he was warned about 3RR before. It was four days ago, though, so I will assume good faith and hope that he won't do it again.  Nish kid 64  00:51, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

AA
Perhaps, but I think 24 hours is good for a first-time 3RR violation. If he persists then it will be lengthened over time (but hopefully this won't have to happen). Khoikhoi 22:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, then I'll let him off easy this time. It's better than no block... Khoikhoi 22:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)



If they really are copyright violations, why don't you report them at WP:AN/I? Khoikhoi 22:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Battle of Avarayr
Hi! If I am not mistaken, Yazdegerd stopped the persecutions when he lost the battle, but the following Shahs continued to persecute Christians. That is why Vahan instigated sporadic rebellions to force the Sassanids to sign the Nvarsak Treaty. This seems to be much more decisive, but there are a few decades that separate it from the battle itself so what happened in between deserves a mention. Regarding Mitanni and those theories... Our history is a long one and it is normal that people would have different interpretations especially for the more ancient years. We do know, however, that Mitanni flourished in Southern Armenia. Right? -- Davo88 22:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

I've read about this earthquake before in MS Encarta which uses the "United States Geological Survey (USGS), National Earthquake Information Center" as source. The Armenian king back then was Hetoum I. However, in my Armenian history book, there is no information about this earthquake or how it influenced the country. My same source (Encarta) also talks of a few other earthquakes in or near Historic Armenia: an earthquake in August 9, 1138 in Aleppo (230,000 dead), another one in Shamakhi in November 1667 (80,000 lives), and lastly in November 18, 1727, Tabrīz (77,000 dead). It is sad that the Armenian Highland is such a seismically active region... -- Davo88 23:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Another thing that you might find interesting... During the reign of Hetoum II, the Mamelukes had taken Hromgla and had kidnapped the Catholicos and a relic of St. Gregory the Illuminator (his right hand). However, cholera and famine started in Egypt and the sultan considered this a punishment imposed to his nation by God for stealing the religious riches. Thus, he let the Catholicos, the relics, and and other riches go back home. -- Davo88 23:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

September Days
They took place way back in 1918. -- Clevelander 00:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that works. -- Clevelander 01:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Also be sure to cite your sources. -- Clevelander 01:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't think so. Do you have independent references confirming this? -- Clevelander 03:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Looks good. Start the article under the name "Kirovabad massacre". -- Clevelander 03:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * BTW, did this occur before or during the Karabakh war? -- Clevelander 03:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * If it was in the 1980s, I assume that it was before the war. When exactly did it take place again? 1988? -- Clevelander 03:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I think we should use some non-Armenian sources for the the article. It'll lend more credibility to it. -- Clevelander 03:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Could you ask User:Khoikhoi to remove the "Baku massacres" article? It'd be too much work to further investigate this (Dacy69's right, Azerbaijan was occupied in April 1920 and these incidents did not occur until May, so I'm not exactly sure what we should do). It'll cause too many issues in the long-run, just remove it. It'll be easier on all of us. -- Clevelander 14:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks! -- Clevelander 22:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * BTW, could you ask User:Khoikhoi to delete the "Kirovabad Pogrom" article? I'm afraid now that we might be opening a can of worms as Azeri editors might retaliate and create an article on the expulsion of Azeris from Armenia. -- Clevelander 03:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Great! I promise that I won't ask you to delete anymore articles in the future. :) -- Clevelander 03:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Oltu
...that is obviously a mistake on my part. -- Clevelander 02:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Is it the real reason?
Can you give me another reason, because Battle of Gamelsdorf is much shorter article and no google references. However, I have not seen anyone asking this article for deletion. Is it related you being an Armenian? I would like to support your view, be open minded but it does not look like a good policy, especially coming from a good wikipedian like you. OttomanReference 04:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Massacres
Done. If you ever need them restored for some purpose, feel free to contact me. Khoikhoi 05:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Battle of Van
I've actually asked Cglassey (a historian) about this before. You can see his reply at User talk:Khoikhoi/Archive 11 If you have any other questions, feel free to ask him, he's definately an expert on the subject. Khoikhoi 20:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * BTW, AA claims there is a consensus to unprotect Haik. Is he correct? Khoikhoi 23:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey, no problem. As for Iğdır Province, I can't protect the page myself because I've reverted the anon twice. Admins can't use their powers in disputes they're involved in. I don't want to end up like this... Khoikhoi 00:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Images
If you find images with no source, you can use Template:nsd. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Assyria
First of all, thank you for joining the project :) . Secondly, thank you for uploading that pic. What do you think we should use it for? I did create a userbox for Wikiproject assyria members (see my userpage.) You can change the pic of htat userbox if you like. Again thanks for everything. Chaldean 04:02, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Nice job. :) Chaldean 04:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey I added this to the Assyrian genocide page; [] - feel free if you want to add it to the Armenian genocide page. Chaldean 06:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

FYI
User space harassment Placing numerous false or questionable 'warnings' on a user's talk page, restoring such comments after a user has removed them, placing 'suspected sockpuppet' and similar tags on the user page of active contributors, and otherwise trying to display material the user may find annoying or embarrassing in their user space is a common form of harassment. A user page is for the person to provide some general information about themself and a user talk page is to facilitate communication. Neither is intended as a 'wall of shame' and should not be used to display supposed problems with the user unless the account has been blocked as a result of those issues. Any sort of content which truly needs to be displayed, or removed, should be immediately brought to the attention of admins rather than edit warring to enforce your views on the content of someone else's user space. --Dacy69 05:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I am aware you deleted this page on pogrom. I, on my part, left Yerevan page. And did some job with Clevelander. Isn't it was part of deal? --Dacy69 15:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Google Earth
Sorry for the delayed response, but I'm not totally sure how to deal with Google Earth images. I would say it's non-commercial licensed, but I'm not an image expert.  Nish kid 64  20:39, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Ararat's 3rr
Probably a good idea. I wanted to warn him one last time in no uncertain terms, however this will probably teach him a needed lesson as well. Thanatosimii 20:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, that's at least two days of peace and quiet. Thanatosimii 22:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw Nareklm. I have also blocked his IP, now.  Nish kid 64  00:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Blocked, and I extended the original block on Ararat to a period of one week. See  Nish kid  64  00:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Socks
You should try WP:RFCU. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:15, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Tigranes the Great
Hi, I added some info to it about an alleged massacre of 80000 romans by mithridates. Take a look.. -- Davo88 20:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I see that you reverted back the size of the image of Tigranes' statue. Don't you think that it and other pictures are too big, considering the length of the article itself and compared to the Tiridates I of Armenia article? -- Davo88 20:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Could you just show me the link to DYK? There are many, yes: That he strengthened Armenia so it reached its political and territorial zenith... That he assumed the Parthian title of Shahanshah... That he confronted Rome... That he built Tigranocerta... And as you said, about Halley too. -- Davo88 05:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi again, check my user page. What is exactly the problem with that seal? -- Davo88 05:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

ARF Flag
Parev Narek, thank you for adding the ARF flag to the article, I had been searching for one myself. Where did you find it from if I may ask?. Thanks again. Fedayee 05:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Alright, shat merci! Fedayee 05:27, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Narek
Put the seal back, or else you know what? Dont make me message Khoikhoi about that ? I'll show him the log of our chat bro im serious. Put the seal back

Hrant Dink
How can we put this in the front page under the "In the News"? Armenian Wikiproject should push for this while the story is hot. Chaldean 18:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * A very sad story indeed. Chaldean 05:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Hehe, another DYK? :) Well, that subject has the capability of becoming a featured article because their are tuns of info on it. I'm sure you seen their website. I really think the Munir Bashir page is capable of being labelled as a good article, so that is what I'm mostly working on right now. Chaldean 05:07, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yea the page is complete. It just needs references. So now I'm just searching around and trying to refrence as many sentences as possible. Chaldean 05:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject
NP. You can change the color here; [] do you see where it says 0099ff at 3 different places? Well all you gotta do is change them to whatever you like. Chaldean 04:23, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Khachkar picture
Hey, I love that picture, but I still want to keep Hrant Dink up at least until Friday or Saturday. -- Aivazovsky 00:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, my mistake. I thought you were referring to WPAM. If you want it featured on the Wikipedia main page, you may have some difficulty as it is neither PD nor is it free license (they only except images with either of these). -- Aivazovsky 01:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Ararat arev
Blocked. Can you please make a checkuser report for Aryatsi? (code letter "F") Make sure to list with a diff of the discussion that resulted in Ararat arev's block. Thanks, Khoikhoi 01:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


 * It's actually pretty easy. Just click here and follow the instructions at the top of the page. Khoikhoi 01:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok. ;-) Khoikhoi 01:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Done. BTW, blocked users are still allowed to edit their talk pages. Khoikhoi 02:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I'll keep an eye on it instead. Khoikhoi 03:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:TigranStatue.jpg
I´m traslating your article about Tigranes the Great to spanish and I´ll appreciate if you upload your image to commons. So, ti will be available for all wikipedias.--FAR 11:32, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Armenia
Hey sorry i'm a little late to respond. Umm I admit it looks a bit too long the Armenia page. Having sections wouldn't be half bad. I think you should contact Aivazovsky about this as he seems to be the most experienced user and is usually managing that page. - Fedayee 04:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
for the image... (and for the article I´m traslating).--FAR 17:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Conflict on Khoikhoi's talk page and elsewhere
There are solutions for this sort of thing. Military history of Armenia has been semiprotected, which should help things. Khoikhoi knows way more about this than I do, obviously, and I trust his judgement. Grand master  ka  08:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Leave it
Farida Mamedova makes a mockery of Azeri scholarship.--  Ευπάτωρ   Talk!! 18:19, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Greece Newsletter - Issue V (I) - January 2007
The January 2007 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter (the first issue after the merger of the History of Greece Wikiproject with the Wikiproject Greece) has been published.

You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link.

Thank you.--Yannismarou 20:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

o.k.
I would not. I do not have enough background to judge the issue. Thanks though.--OttomanReference 03:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Rasulzadeh article
I'm sorry I reverted your edits on the Rasulzadeh page but it had to be done because of Adil's massive removal of sourced information. I appreciate the work you did though. Thanks.Azerbaijani 05:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Re:
We need a better picture of the coa.--  Ευπάτωρ   Talk!! 14:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice but the name of the image is bad, it should be something like Shushi_COA or something.--  Ευπάτωρ   Talk!! 18:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to March Days
Hi. In response to a message on WP:ANI regarding your behavior, I have posted a neutral third opinion on Talk:March Days. Your imput would be very much appreciated.  Srose  (talk)  17:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It looks good by all means; it's cited and certainly NPOV, reflecting the atrocities committed against both sides. :) You may not need to add the whole thing, of course, just so that facts are not repeated too much.  Srose  (talk)  00:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

DYK!
--Savidan 18:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * BRAVO!!!!! Chaldean 23:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

thanks
Thanks for putting good source link on Balouch. you shoudl read that artilce too and you can contribute on Balouch page. Khalidkhoso 17:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello
Hello Narek, someone without and registered name, who I don't even know aksed me to add Uratu image back in to the Military History of Armenia articel. I was wondering if you know who that person is? Because I saw in the history of that articel that he keeps putting in and you keep deleting it. ROOB323 01:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Public domain
I'm actually not sure. Try asking someone at Village pump (policy). <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 03:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I told him, if she starts disruptive edits similar to his, she will be blocked. <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 03:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * What do you mean? She's never edited Urartu. <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 03:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * He's pushing for an indef. block anyways... <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 05:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Shushi Coat of Arms
Yeah, lets use the one that you have. It is much better than the other one I uploaded. ROOB323 03:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Your recent request for checkuser
You recently compiled and listed a case at request for checkuser. For an outcome to be achieved, we require you list the code letter which matches with the violations of policy, which is listed at the top of the request for checkuser page. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. Daniel.Bryant 10:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC), checkuser clerk.

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Akhurian River, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  19:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Good work on the DYK's, you've gotten a fair number of them already. I'm very happy to see you're contributing more positively. And I'm glad I didn't block you a second time... at one point, I counted up that you'd made more than 30 copyvios, and was very close to blocking again for several weeks. Anyway, keep up the good work. --Interiot 20:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Wiki Policies
Yes, it's WP:NPA ("Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor.") <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 03:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't think so. He's not really insulting anyone, is he? <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 03:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes
Yes, I agree with you. The admin on the check user page declined my check IP simply because of a technicality. I will talk to him. It would probably help if you cited your concerns also.Azerbaijani 04:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Amazon disambig page.
This is kind of old now, but, er, how to put this. What were you trying to do by moving the Amazon page to Amazon (people)? I mean, if you didn't realize that the Amazons article existed and didn't notice the link on top of the page (blind spots happen), then you could have created the Amazon (people) article, then edited in a link to it on the disambig page at Amazon. Even after you did move it, when you recreated a new disambiguation page, you left off all the summaries and a lot of the entries from the old page. Now the history of the disambig page is off in the "wrong" article and difficult to see. Hardly a major deal, but still.

This isn't to flame you as I see you've made a fair amount of good contributions, but I do want to bring this to your attention. SnowFire 21:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Turkish coffee
No, Turkish coffee is definitely the more common term. See:


 * Results 1 - 10 of about 75,500 for "Greek coffee"
 * Results 1 - 10 of about 573,000 for "Turkish coffee"

Or, if you trust printed books more:


 * Books 1 - 10 of 565 on "Greek coffee"
 * Books 1 - 10 of 751 on "Turkish coffee"

<span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 05:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes, but 1,750,000 is more than 1,680,000, right? Besides, you should always use quotes when searching for things like that. Your method makes it search for the words "Greek" and "coffee" separately. The quotes make it search only for the term "Greek coffee". <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 05:21, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Kanun
Hi Nareklm,

I think you should consider creating a separate page (i.e. Kanun (musical instrument)) as the category you assigned to Kanun does not match the article content (i.e. an Albanian code of law). thanks, -- Asterion talk 18:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)


 * No worries. Have a nice day. -- Asterion talk 20:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Manti
Hey Narek, I added all I know about the Armenian manti from my mom's cooking but that's all I could get, I tried to find info on the net but it's mostly recipies and stuff. - Fedayee 02:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

IP and their 3RR on Armenian language
Now blocked Glen 04:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * May I unprotect your talk page? Its been protected for a couple weeks now Glen 04:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Unprotected (tho I kept the move protection enabled for new editors) Glen 04:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Please dont let this guy get you worked up. Unfortunately you've just made a personal attack (the two year old comment) - and I can't and won't tolerate name calling on either side (I realise he's been calling you ignorant - but he's about to be blocked anyhow). Please take the higher road here Glen 05:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah, if he's blocked indef then all his socks will be blocked on site. Tough thing is that he's either using open proxys or has multiple ISPs so its hard for me to tell which are his (or not) Glen 05:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I've blocked all the IPs he's used. Please let me know if there are more Glen 05:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Narek, you can try using WP:AIV in the future. <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 05:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I've range blocked his ISP - that should slow him down. I'm now blocking Ararat arev indefinitely. Glen 05:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Another range blocked. Are you interested in having your talk page sprotected again? Luna Santin 23:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Do you find it strange that Angine showed up just when ararat_arev got blocked? Vartanm 06:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Russian 102nd Military Base
Hi Narek, I noticed that you have added lot of pictures on the Armenian military. Tanks airplanes, soldiers... I was wondering if you have any pictures that we could put in the Russian 102nd Military Base articel since that articel does not have any pictures and I couldn't find any pictures. ROOB323 04:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

3RR
Yes, see Three-revert_rule. <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 07:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Qazakh
Thanks. -- Aivazovsky 11:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Edit warring
You have been engaging in edit warring at Equality Party (Azerbaijan) recently. Please stop unproductive and confrontational warring and restrict disagreements to talk page discussion. If you have problems, use the dispute resolution process. Persistent edit warring instead of dispute warring may met with blocks. In particular, accusations of vandalism, such as are uncivil and unconstructive. Please take a look at Help:Reverting. Dmcdevit·t 05:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Good article status
I dont know if you've checked your user page yet, but Assyrian independence reached good article state. Check this out [] those two flags being waved side by side sure do look nice like that :D More pics [] [] [] [] [] - perhaps we can use these pics somewhere. Maybe a page talking about Assyrian-Armenian relations? Chaldean 15:48, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Cool. Armenian-Assyrian relations. Chaldean 16:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Your right. Maybe we should split it into multiple paragraphs. Chaldean 18:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thought you might wanted to see the video too :) Chaldean 00:34, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Zoia Ceauşescu
You think you could have a look at this article for allegations of PoV and unresolved facts? It's discussed on the talk page. Circeus 17:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Baibars
If you look at the protection log, you will see that it was actually protected by William M. Connolley (which said "expires 2007-02-01T19:40:11"). I just added the tag. <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 06:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Ete 100 tokosanots hayastantsi es hord het xosa u patmutiun sovorir. Why are you a member of wikipedia greece and assyria then? Or who is acting under the name Chaldean and doind exactly what you are dointg. I live in New York City and I know where Boston is and who lives there. Dont give me a history lesson, you are not that good at history. Again, warning keep out of Armenian history edits and reverts. You are not competent. You are just playing there as a spoiled child. This is for you to learn about daniel bek Pirumov. http://www.persons.am/ru/comments.php?do=read&id=427

Second, you and your friend roob323 or chaldean keep using armeniapedia version about the Battle of Sardarapat. But not the whole version, without the last sentence. Moreover, there is nothing about proclaiming independence of Armenia twice or ottoman crackdown on Armenia in early may when armenia was independent. Whose fruit of fantacy is this? Yours Chaldean's or Roob 323. All 3 of you are kind of paranoic.

Notible people died during the genocide
What do you think about creating a page listing all notible people (professors, religious leaders, etc) who died during the 3 genocides? Chaldean 04:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

No sig or subst at User talk:ArmenianNY for 3RR
I was awfully suprised you did not subst the 3RR warning at User talk:ArmenianNY or sign the post. Did you forget? Will (Talk - contribs) 06:07, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Scythians
You accuse me of synthesising published material. Where do I combine the findings of different authors or sources to a new stance? Please be careful to what you state and before you revert again without Talk. Scythians have been abundantly asserted to be of mixed composition. So what information a generalized statement like "Scythians spoke an Iranian language" really gives us? Almost nothing. Anybody opposing nuances should produce sourced evidence on cultural AND archeological AND linguistical arguments. Tertiary sources are not sufficient to uphold a generalised view, that could easily misguide readers into thinking Scythians represented Aryan - or even PIE - purity of race, culture and language. Essentially Scythians introduced a new way of living into the steppes that can't be extrapolated to Indo-European proportions. My contribution therefore is not POV but meant to counterbalance a misleading lack of information. Please make yourself clear, in the meanwhile I will restore the better sourced version. Rokus01 08:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Question
You know all those battles you made? how come there's no information just wondering, also did you break it down? and call them battles, some info would help thanks. Nareklm 13:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Lets look the the basic common ground. There is no question regarding if these armed conflicts exist. You are having problem with a person who says s/he is an Armenian with an extensive knowledge on them. :-) There is no question that they existed, so do not try to bring validity questions by claiming I created the article. Where does your disagreements originate from? It is not from the Ottoman Empire side, for sure. Your arguments are Armenian issues which can render some of the heroes as a reckless belligerent person. Could that be the reason this period is silenced as you are saying "there's no information"? The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk clearly defines where the boarders are in March 3, 1918. I look at the ongoing discussions and changes made at the page. I want to point out something. You know, establishment of a state is before the people of the state declare it "internationally". The military power of the Democratic Republic of Armenia did not established in a single day, as some want to claim, The miracle day is 28 May, 1918. If you think the details of Ottoman Empire and Armenian genocide is a big issue? The details of this war is bigger, as all these conflicts are part of "the Armenians: Past and Present in the Making of National Identity". Remember, these patriots wanted to keep the land and their main goal was to declare the republic. They declared the republic but... In 1918 there was famine and sickness in these lands, and these are heroic victories (not on the Ottoman side) are very controversial. You have to recognize that the people who declared the Armenia is the same people that build the Armenian resistance between 1915-1918. I guess, we can eliminate the argument that they are aliens coming from alpha-century, and they have no responsibility of shaping the grand picture. That is the reason details are really important for this group, so that they can have a perfect nationhood. Today, I can not add a basic fact to Armenian Genocide as anything beyond the simplistic view is rejected by Armenians, what makes you think that I can be part of basically an Armenian NATIONAL issue. It is time for Armenians looking from a bigger window. The Armenians that died during this period deserve a better analysis. I hope you will continue digging the events, which will be very educational to all parties. I would like to see some citations, but all sides brought their arguments without citations. PS: from Ottoman Empire perspective, the location of military forces are defined by Armistice of Mudros. ThanksOttomanReference 16:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Your going a little far there, heh, well i don't know if you had any education on this, i wasn't accusing you of anything i was just wondering, by the way by "famine and sickness" you were referring to the Armenian Genocide right? but don't you think all the deportations caused this? thats my analysis. Even if the ottomans made Armenians walk and leave there homes out of "war zones" they still were responsibly, im not a person who shoves the genocide through someones throat and accuses them, this was obviously a small case that turned big. Maybe it wasn't the Turks intention for the Armenians to die, look at the pictures, if the Turks were barbaric why would they make the Armenians walk? why didn't they kill them already? and cut there heads off or something, eh what do i care let the historians debate this and initialize it. Nareklm  13:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I do not know, what to say to you. I'm not genocide denier. The problems you are facing (if you follow the lead) is a little bit complex. Not everything in Armenian history can be explained by Ottomans, or genocide. As I said, it is hard to move within Armenian national issues, so many deep wells. Also, there is always that ottoman factor that pops up, like pop-ups of MTV. I guess Ottoman Empire was like USA of today; remember the claims of Indian tsunami caused by a military submarine. :-)  AND Armenians need to remember that people walked from both sides. People walked in the war zones, even today (see:First Battle of Fallujah). I was not thinking about walking Armenians. I believe the issues that Yerevan had faced was more than just walking Armenians. What I'm saying is simple. Turks needs to do some digging, but Armenians do not? Just look at the battles that happened during the Europe side of WWI. Some of those battles includes less military force and smaller civilian effects. There is much more to this period beyond the arguments of (the battle) existence or who won the battle. AND only Armenians can walk that path as anything that may come from ottoman side would be a "denial of genocide". It sounds like a cover-up plot for preventing deeper analysis. Good luck & have a nice day OttomanReference 17:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

RV
Sorry for the mess ;-) I was about to revert it but you were faster ;-) Happy Editing by  Snowolf (talk) on  19:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Levon Ter-Petrossyan
Oh ok, than I'll add him back, thanks ROOB323 22:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Your Flickr image uploads
I have noticed that you uploaded several Creative Commons images from Flickr today. You marked those pictures as cc-by-nd-2.5, but unfortunately, they were all licensed as cc-by-nc-nd-2.0, cc-by-2.0 or cc-by-nc-2.0, none of which are appropriate for use on Wikipedia, and subject to speedy deletion.

Please remember to tag your photos correctly, and do not use any non-derivative or non-commercial licensed photos. Mosmof 00:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Cussing
Well, if you look at Civility, you will notice that "Rudeness" is one of them. So yes, if you say something like, "stop fucking reverting my edits", it would violate WP:CIVIL. However, I guess it depends on the context you use a cuss word in. If you get frustrated, check out WP:COOL or try taking a wikibreak. :-) <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 01:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * If you read this, it says, "This is to confirm that Wikipedia user Baku87 and  Azeri and Wikimedia Commons user  Azeri is the owner of this website." <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 03:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * What are you talking about? The image was uploaded by User:Baku87... <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 03:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Perhaps. Add Template:Imagevio to it. <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 03:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * But Abşeron is the correct spelling. Izmir probably gets more Google hits than İzmir. <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 06:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The "This is English Wikipedia" argument doesn't really apply when it comes to diacritics. They are not two different words, just different spellings. If we wanted to use the "English spelling" for articles, shouldn't we move Abülfaz Elçibay to Abulfaz Elcibay? (the Azeri spelling is Əbülfəz Elçibəy) <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 07:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Revertions
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user talk page. I saw that it was a dynamic IP of a user I had previously blocked yesterday for vandalism. I have now blocked this user for 48 hours. Thanks again,  Nish kid 64  02:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair Use images
Dear Nareklm, Please check ;"fair use image(s) per terms of Wikipedia:Fair_use#Policy item #9 " before your reverts. Regards. Must <sup style="color:blue;">TC 08:16, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Please be cool
I've blocked you and Dacy69 for 24 hours because you need to cool down and rethink your attitude. This block is not a punishment, it's an attempt to get your attention. Allow me to offer some unsolicited advice. This is not a template pasted to your talk page, so I'd appreciate if you thought about what I have to say. Your petty bickering with Dacy69 is not productive, and your are making way to many reverts. This is a problem because hostile attitudes and battleground mentalities hinder proper collaborative editing and progress. In particular, when you get into a dispute with another editor, even one you think is pushing a POV abhorrent to you, take your time in writing comments, and don't let yourself get worked up. Sometimes you will even have to deal with unreasonable people; we all have. We need to do this tactfully. Consider that perhaps the other editor perceives you in the same way. Rather than doing things like reporting them to administrators for blocks, or trying to prove their misconduct; imagine how you would feel if someone "reported" you for alleged misbehavior: you wouldn't like it. It would escalate the conflict. Instead, remain cordial and don't engage in petty behavior outside of dispute resolution (discussion/mediation). If simple discussion isn't working, or you notice that it's getting heated quickly, disengage from the conflict and seek outside opinions and mediation, and be willing to make a serious attempt at compromise. I'm concerned that your recent behavior - excessive reverts and sniping - are in the opposite of this collaborative, WP:AGF community spirit. Hopefully you'll make use of this short time off to familiarize yourself with the various dispute resolution precesses, and hopefully to draw up a mediation request to resolve the conflict amicably. Thanks. Dmcdevit·t 04:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Armenians
With respect to a recent revert war in the said article: please discuss further changes on the talk page before reverting. -- May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 06:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Block-evading sockpuppets
Although I technically should, I won't restart your block for sockpuppeting to evade the block on this account (which is directly prohibited by WP:SOCK). Please do not do this in the future - most admins would have blocked, and I will if you do it again. As a note, I blocked indefinitely. Cheers,  Daniel.Bryant  10:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

WP:NPA
Please paste the diff and the whole passage I posted, in my talk page, otherwise you are breaking WP:NPA, and your message will be reomved. Jidan 16:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I asked you to post the whole passage. Did Mardavich tell you not to do that? ;) Jidan 17:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Amanhosital.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Amanhosital.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Varazdat
He was the winner of the last Ancient Olympics Game in pancration (boxing).--  Ευπάτωρ   Talk!! 20:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Warring with AdilBaguirov
I am still concerned that you are carrying on sterile edit warring with AdilBaguirov. You've reverted him personally three times today, , , twice using automated edit summaries, which are disrespectful and inappropriate for non-vandalism (Help:Revert). It is still unconstructive if you revert war across many articles, rather than making many reverts in one article. Please seek mediation, or some other WP:DR. Dmcdevit·t 21:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not talking about Adil's reverts, I'm talking about yours. If I were an editor that disagreed with you, and you reverted my edit without any communication beforehand at the same time that you went to the talk page, I would feel insulted, and less likely to come to an agreement. It won't hurt anyone to let the text you disagree with stay up for a day or two while you talk it out; in fact, you will be more likely to get what you want that way. Dmcdevit·t 21:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * How can you posibly claim that you will assume good faith while at the same time attacking the character of the person you disagree with? This is unacceptable: "i know what he is i know what he does, please go do some research on him he is Anti-Armenian and Iranian". As WP:NPA says, Comment on content, not on the contributor. One of the pillars of Wikipedia is Etiquette. I think you need to take the spirit of wikiquette to heart. Dmcdevit·t 22:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

My Request for protection
Are you saying they wont accept my request for protection?Azerbaijani 23:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh hey.Azerbaijani 23:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Kurdish words
Hi,

I just wanted to conform to the standard Kurdish latin alphabet, so that those familiar with Kurdish can be able to read and use the table.Heja Helweda 02:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Commendation
Thanks Artax, your contributions are equally as important and valuable. --MarshallBagramyan 04:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Karabakh
The map does not show the whole of Karabakh (only the mountainous part). Is there any chance you can find a better one? <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 07:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Leonte Tismăneanu
Hi Artaxiad: you reverted the above article, are you familiar with the issue or just thought you might step in? Can you explain why? thanks. (Icar 08:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC))

Leonte Tismăneanu sorry, here is the page you reverted. I had confused ă for a similar character. (Icar 09:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC))

Chaldean
User:Chaldean keeps reverting to the same page he has written because he only wants his biased opinion. I've had wanted to contribute to the page in which I did but & including at least 3 sources but User:Chaldean keeps on deleting my contributions & reverted three times to his biased material that is written by him. He has been vandalizing my talk page & telling me that I have been doing wrong where in all reality he has been trying moderate the wiki with his biased beliefs & using intimidation/assault/negativity to anyone who helps. Please help because he has stirred away a lot of users from that subject & making them believe in whats not true. Thank You! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by KALMANI (talk • contribs) 17:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC).

Artin Penik
I reverted your closure of the AFD, since there's still one editor with an outstanding "Delete" opinion. If you can get him to withdraw, we can probably close, but as long as he's sticking to his guns it needs to remain open until an outside party decides to close it.

Also, I removed the speedy tag, because if nothing else the record of the AFD discussion should be added to the article's talk page. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 20:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Arbitration
I have opened an arbitration case regarding the current editing dispute you've been involved in. Please make a statement at Requests_for_arbitration concerning the conflict with the other parties listed. Thanks. Dmcdevit·t 10:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

You might wish to expand it a bit
Hi! Just wanted to point out that DYK's have to be > 1500 chars. You might wish to expand Ara Sarafyan a bit to make sure it makes it. --Free smyrnan 12:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

SEY01
What is wrong with the explanation of the target of ASALA? SEY01 15:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

VartanM
Those "sources" on the arbitration page provided by atabek are useless. None of them even mention Monte. Vartanm 03:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

շնորհակալ եմ, Thank you Vartanm 19:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi
I was checking the changes to Cyrus Cylinder, in which came across your name, subsequently end it up in the SandBox! You may be interested to read the following news: Arran Erases Famous Armenian Medieval Cemetery —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ParthianShot (talk • contribs) 08:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC).

Image tagging for Image:Leoa.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Leoa.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Image patrolling
Hi, thanks for helping with patroling image copyrights. However, I think you needn't tag those images from www.euro-caspian.com, the website has plausibly confirmed that its owner is identical with the image uploader, so those should be okay. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Right, I see your point, but most of the images really don't look implausible - they are not particularly professional or anything like that, so I find it entirely believable that some guy who owns that website just took them himself. Or have you found any of them on other third-party websites that make a stronger, more plausible claim to be the creators? Have you asked the uploader to comment? As long as we have no actual evidence that something is fishy, I guess we can afford to take their word for it - if it turns out to be a copyvio after all, it's their problem, not ours. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow, seems you have a point. That etravels.cz page isn't making an explicit claim to authorship either, but those are embedded into series of photographs clearly taken by the same person, with more images than on the euro-caspian site, and the same person also having traveled through other countris; that would make them the more likely owners. Sigh. Another heap of bad images to clean up. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I think before I take action actually deleting these, I'll try to contact the uploader and give them a chance for clarification. Guess that'd be fair. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * What is your problem with the all the images uploaded by Azerbaijani users? I think you should also thoroughly check the images uploaded by Armenian users, I don't think that most of them have no copyright problems. Images uploaded by Baku87 are used by him with permission. And do not remove the image Khan Nakhichevanski. It is PD, as it was taken in 1906 is more than 100 years old. Grandmaster 16:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add further evidence
The request for Arbitration is meant to present the cases to be heard, one Arbitrator(the administrator who submitted the case and who resigned) left and I don't think he was replaced, so the case will be heard. No need to add more evidence. I also highly advice you to read how the arbitration works and other past cases anf familiarise with how evidences are presented. There is no point to document on every Azeri users, neither retaliating against those who submit evidences against you. You should only provide evidences against those who you think Administrators shal take action against. You will anyway have the chance to defend yourself like every other people concerned. Fad (ix) 17:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Arbitration does not take vengence and its decisions are not punishing but protect the system(Wikipedia). Take this as an experience, and if you are "sentenced" for anything you should not be pissed, no one beside Adil have done anything to get very heavy "sentences" beside maybe me, for my personal attacks against some members. Your use of sock was not a good thing, you should have never done that, this was basically why I ignored your last email, I didn't like what you did. The mistake was done, we can't change the past, but we can have an impact on the future. Right now work on your evidences, accumulate as much as you can, work it on a subsection of your userpage. Don't accumulate them as retaliation of evidences brought by others, you will have the chance to defend yourself later. Fad (ix) 19:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * There is no Them vs us, you are mislead by Adil polarisation of the members. It is true that you have been warned, don't worry you haven't done anything major, the only person who did is Adil and his meatpuppets. Fad (ix) 19:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * There is just more than simple IP uses, check Urartu article history, Tabib was involved in the past, the probability that either Dacy or Atabek is him is very high. BTW, don't get involved on image copyright stuff, just contribute in Armenian related articles, don't "invade" Azeri one, this will be viewed as retaliation to Adil invasion of Armenian articles. If you know Russian, you can be of great help to find out under which account Tabib has contributed on Russian wikipedia, when he stoped contributing, when Dacy appeared in the picture there, and if there was an Atabek etc. The IP's you find, check if they have contributed there and also the IP's from ru to here. While their possible misbehavior on Russian Wikipedia can not be used as evidence, this might help for the cronology of the event and better understanding for me to prepare my evidence and find where else to check. There is definitive organization and I intend to find it out. Fad (ix) 23:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Page at User:Nareklm/RA messing up Special:BrokenRedirects
Could you please move or archive the stuff at User:Nareklm/RA below the redirect? It is messing up the page at Special:BrokenRedirects, which I am using to find redirects to nowhere for speedy deletion. Thanks. Jesse Viviano 04:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I found out that this was an archive. I will try to edit this to use a soft redirect to fix this. Jesse Viviano 04:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I left a note stating that newer archives could be found at User:Artaxiad/RA, because I did not want to destroy the archives. Jesse Viviano 04:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Urartu
Per WP:V, I think the Columbia info can stay. However, if you want to add additional info from another POV, feel free to add another quote. <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 08:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Who is Movses? The article is dated 2001. If it's irrelevant to the section, perhaps it should be moved elsewhere? <span style="font-family:monospace, monospace;">Khoikhoi 08:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan
Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 18:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I suggest you to remove your evidences from there and only add them after having accumulated a significant number and getting it reviewed by others. Fad (ix) 18:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Namag ounis. Fad (ix) 18:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * You may add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan/Evidence, and make proposals regarding the case outcome on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan/Workshop. Please do not edit the final decision section of the main case page. The final decision will only be added after it has been voted on and made official by the arbitraotrs. Thatcher131 19:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Please use edit summaries in your edits to March Days. This will help others understand your changes. Thank you for understanding. Picaroon 19:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

List of people with epilepsy
Thanks very much for your recent rv to this article. You help to keep Wikipedia worth reading. Cheers, Colin°Talk 22:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Committee injunction
The Arbitration Committee has adopted a temporary injunction in the case of Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan, in which you have been named as a party. The injunction provides: Until the conclusion of this case, all parties are restricted to one content revert per article per day, and each content revert must be accompanied by a justification on the relevant talk page. Violators may be blocked for up to 24 hours. The case remains open for the submission of evidence or proposals. This notice is given by a Clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad 00:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

thanks :-)
I see that you have created two pages for my IP's account - which you know perfectly belongs to me. You even mentioned that on one user talkpage. So, I don't know why you have created that pages. It was just technical errors and 1-2 times I forgot to do that. FYI - I login from my home and office comps but always sign in under my name. But anyway - thank you for nice welcoming note :-) --Dacy69 04:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the vandalism revert
Thanks for the vandalism revert on the American Dietetic Association. I really appreciated it. Chris 14:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting my talk page --St.daniel 15:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Your arbitration evidence
I'm writing again as a Clerk for the Arbitration Committee. You have placed responses or rebuttal in another user's section on the evidence page. As the instructions indicate, each user should place evidence in his or her section only, and subject to a length limit of approximately 1000 words. Since as far as I know this is your first experience with arbitration, rather than simply going ahead and removing the threaded discussion I am giving you 24 hours to remove what you have put in other people's sections and incorporate it, if you see fit, in your own section within the overall limit. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Newyorkbrad 18:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Tagging images for speedy deletion
For future reference, the &#123;{speedy-image-c}} template is to go on the article that includes the image in question, not on the image itself. The image should be appropriately tagged with a &#123;{ifd}} or a speedy deletion template. --Iamunknown 15:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the good catch!
Thanks for watching my back on the user Talk page! See you around, (aeropagitica) 15:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Copyright
Please do not post copyright infringements like Aray. The website you took the words from doesn't have a license compatible with Wikipedia. Picaroon 22:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

WPAM template
Unfortunately I know nothing about editing templates. BTW, the WPAM template currently has a problem - it extends and engulfs all that is below it. For an example, please check how Talk:Vakıflı looks. The WPTR template was recently modified/improved by AtilimGunesBaydin, you may want to ask him. --Free smyrnan 00:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Admin
Check out some of the new admins. Basically, they participate in many facets of Wikipedia, like article editing, AIV, RFPP, XfD, etc. My only concern about you going up for adminship is the whole frequent edit war situation. The same thing happened to Khoikhoi when he went up for adminship, and he had almost 40,000 edits when he finally got it. Knowing your work, I know it's hard to get into disputes, and that's perfectly fine. I don't know about your civility, but be civil to users you are in a discussion with, and I think that would really help your cause. I was considering nominating you, but I'd prefer to wait until everything is checked out. And adminship is harder than it seems. You're frequently asked to deal with issues, and help mediate disputes between multiple users. It's sticky business.  Nish kid 64  23:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I wasn't saying you need to get a billion edits, but just keep up what you're doing and you should be fine.  Nish kid 64  23:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Cheers
Thanks a bunch for reverting the vandalism onmy userpage, it was much appreciated, kind regards Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 16:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:ANI
I'm not doing anything about it, but generally it's a better idea not to remove debates from WP:ANI in the case of users who are inexperienced in the ways of the page - they can sometimes get the "wrong end of the stick" and re-add the discussion, wondering where it's gone. Cheers. Yuser31415 20:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Askeran
I don't know why you're asking me this question. Yes, Askeran clashes and first two Azeris shot was the beginning of the contemporary NK conflict, which pursued with 26 Armenians killed in Sumgayit, 200,000 Azeris deported from Armenia, 250,000 Armenians deported from Azerbaijan, some 500 Azeris brutally massacred with mutilations in Khojaly, and 600-700,000 Azeris deported from Karabakh and other surrounding regions of Azerbaijan, final count about 30,000 total killed on both sides. The facts are there, many, including myself, witnessed some of those. I don't see why that should raise any questions. Atabek 01:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Calm down?! I am calm, dude, thanks for asking :) Make your edits, and if I have something to say, I will in terms of my edits or discussions on the talk page. Atabek 01:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Good, I like you continuing to think so. That's exactly why I edit poet Huseyn Javid page and make a "typo" adding a little "ov", cause I know there is someone out there following my edits :). Atabek 01:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Were you stocking on people, then? That's not quite decent, you know. But as I said, I like you continuing to think so. Atabek 02:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Indeed, there must be only one Azeri in Irvine, CA, and with PhD sure why not. I take it :) Atabek 02:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * No, but if you insist, I will take the lovely PhD part :) The poet lived in early 20th century and died in 1941. Atabek 02:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Good luck further Google searching. Stocking is not healthy though, especially not after men :) Atabek 02:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)